Re: [Suspected Junk Mail] New functionality in PR - priority

I believe you have brought this up, and I and others have explained the
purposes of the design on many different threads on the list the last few
weeks. And I believe we have explained it fairly completely already. Do you
want me to repeat the reasons in this email thread?
On May 29, 2015 6:36 AM, "Jan-Ivar Bruaroey" <jib@mozilla.com> wrote:

>  On 5/28/15 11:02 AM, Bernard Aboba wrote:
>
>   ...  all settings need to be part of RtpParameters so changes can be
> applied all at once.
>
>
> This seems unnecessarily complicated and novel vs. natural attributes, so
> I'd like proponents to explain exactly what problems they are compensating
> for (concurrency?), as well as what the desired properties are
> (transaction? async return values?)
>
> .: Jan-Ivar :.
>
>