W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > May 2015

Re: [Suspected Junk Mail] New functionality in PR - priority

From: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 12:48:12 -0400
Message-ID: <5568984C.9050608@mozilla.com>
To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
CC: Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>, public-webrtc@w3.org, Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
I think I understand how the proposal works, but if you could outline 
the discrete problems we need to address - without presupposing a 
specific solution - then I would appreciate it, as I think this would 
let us:

 1. Consider the merits of the proposal in addressing the stated
    problems vs. API inconvenience, and
 2. Judge proposals against something concrete other than the merits of
    the current lone proposal.


.: Jan-Ivar :.

On 5/29/15 12:03 PM, Peter Thatcher wrote:
> I believe you have brought this up, and I and others have explained 
> the purposes of the design on many different threads on the list the 
> last few weeks. And I believe we have explained it fairly completely 
> already. Do you want me to repeat the reasons in this email thread?
> On May 29, 2015 6:36 AM, "Jan-Ivar Bruaroey" <jib@mozilla.com 
> <mailto:jib@mozilla.com>> wrote:
>     On 5/28/15 11:02 AM, Bernard Aboba wrote:
>>      ... all settings need to be part of RtpParameters so changes can
>>     be applied all at once.
>     This seems unnecessarily complicated and novel vs. natural
>     attributes, so I'd like proponents to explain exactly what
>     problems they are compensating for (concurrency?), as well as what
>     the desired properties are (transaction? async return values?)
>     .: Jan-Ivar :.
Received on Friday, 29 May 2015 16:50:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:44 UTC