Re: WebRTC Data Channel in Workers Proposal

• From: <piranna@gmail.com>
• Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 19:28:10 +0200
• To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
• Cc: Feross Aboukhadijeh <feross@feross.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <CAKfGGh1dzeamqKinaQUTGi7gTamRSmcPgR6oXuqGL2j-MW-gmQ@mail.gmail.com>

>> I would like to propose that we support WebRTC Data Channel in Workers
>> (`WebWorker`, `ServiceWorker`, etc.)
>
> This proposal needs considerably more substance.  For instance, the
> implementation of something like this in a ServiceWorker in particular
> is not suited to the lifecycle model of service workers.

Not on ServiceWorkers like you said due to their lifecycle, but it
makes sense to have them on SharedWorkers... and this last ones can be
accessed from the ServiceWorkers on demand :-)


-- 
"Si quieres viajar alrededor del mundo y ser invitado a hablar en un
monton de sitios diferentes, simplemente escribe un sistema operativo
Unix."
– Linus Tordvals, creador del sistema operativo Linux

Received on Tuesday, 26 May 2015 17:28:58 UTC