On 18 May 2015 at 12:21, Benjamin Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> wrote: > We could certainly add an event that fires every time bufferedAmount > decreases. I expect this would generally amount to an event for every call > to send(). In my view, this is wasteful, because the only real use I see > for the event is to check whether bufferedAmount is below a threshold. Or you could take a step back and use the streams API instead.Received on Monday, 18 May 2015 19:47:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:18:06 UTC