W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > May 2015

Re: Charter task force - list of volunteers

From: Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 12:41:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPF_GTaOeEU7BQSwof84_pGJ9CDJUnUzDtyzbBuo=j+6hLvH+w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, "Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)" <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>
Thanks Herald,

More for Dom, I would also ask that we add the Decision Policy copy that I
inadvertantly removed when doing the Charter diffs be added back in as


Decision Policy

As explained in the Process Document ( section 3.3 ), this group will seek
to make decisions when there is consensus. When the Chair puts a question
and observes dissent, after due consideration of different opinions, the
Chair should record a decision (possibly after a formal vote) and any
objections, and move on.

Editors are responsible for reflecting the consensus from the Working Group
in the specifications; where editors bring technical solutions in the
specifications that have not been reviewed by the group, these solutions
are annotated to reflect their status.

Contributors are encouraged to bring specific modifications (e.g. as
patches) to the group's specifications to facilitate their review by the
group and eventual integration by the editors.



*Erik Lagerway <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/lagerway> | *Hookflash
<http://hookflash.com/>* | 1 (855) Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter
<http://twitter.com/elagerway> | WebRTC.is Blog <http://webrtc.is/> *

On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 11:39 PM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>

> The following people volunteered for the charter task force:
> - Andy Hutton <andrew.hutton@unify.com>
> - Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com>
> - Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@microsoft.com>
> - Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
> - Göran Eriksson <goran.ap.eriksson@ericsson.com>
> - Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com
> We think that we’re very close to achieving a consensus on the charter,
> and if the members of this task force can all agree on a single proposal
> (and agree that they agree), we think that this is worth proposing to
> the group and the AC as a proposed “next generation” charter.
> Naturally, this group does not have decision-making power; we have asked
> them to propose something they feel that they can all agree with, and
> will then bring that proposal to the WG.
> Harald, for the chairs.
Received on Monday, 18 May 2015 19:41:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:18:06 UTC