- From: Göran Eriksson AP <goran.ap.eriksson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 19:59:21 +0000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Benjamin Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>
- CC: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
-----Original Message----- From: "Martin com>" <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Date: Monday 18 May 2015 21:46 To: Benjamin Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>, W3C WEBRTC <public-webrtc@w3.org> Subject: Re: Data Channel Buffer Management Proposal Resent-From: W3C WEBRTC <public-webrtc@w3.org> Resent-Date: Monday 18 May 2015 21:47 >On 18 May 2015 at 12:21, Benjamin Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> wrote: >> We could certainly add an event that fires every time bufferedAmount >> decreases. I expect this would generally amount to an event for every >>call >> to send(). In my view, this is wasteful, because the only real use I >>see >> for the event is to check whether bufferedAmount is below a threshold. > >Or you could take a step back and use the streams API instead. Do You mean this Streams API, https://streams.spec.whatwg.org/? >
Received on Monday, 18 May 2015 19:59:49 UTC