W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > May 2015

Re: Data Channel Buffer Management Proposal

From: Göran Eriksson AP <goran.ap.eriksson@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 19:59:21 +0000
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Benjamin Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>
CC: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D180111F.146D5%goran.ap.eriksson@ericsson.com>


-----Original Message-----
From: "Martin com>" <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Monday 18 May 2015 21:46
To: Benjamin Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>,
W3C WEBRTC <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Data Channel Buffer Management Proposal
Resent-From: W3C WEBRTC <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Monday 18 May 2015 21:47

>On 18 May 2015 at 12:21, Benjamin Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> wrote:
>> We could certainly add an event that fires every time bufferedAmount
>> decreases.  I expect this would generally amount to an event for every
>>call
>> to send().  In my view, this is wasteful, because the only real use I
>>see
>> for the event is to check whether bufferedAmount is below a threshold.
>
>Or you could take a step back and use the streams API instead.

Do You mean this Streams API, https://streams.spec.whatwg.org/?

>
Received on Monday, 18 May 2015 19:59:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:44 UTC