- From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 10:15:58 -0700
- To: Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com>
- Cc: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, "Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)" <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>
- Message-ID: <CABcZeBOf_rU74_kvf6pm0FAdQ+v1E1gxg2Qyz_o0rdX0GhxBmg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com> wrote: > Thanks Herald, > > More for Dom, I would also ask that we add the Decision Policy copy that I > inadvertantly removed when doing the Charter diffs be added back in as > well... > > -- > I'm not against having a decision policy but I have some questions about this one. > Decision Policy > > As explained in the Process Document ( section 3.3 ), this group will seek > to make decisions when there is consensus. When the Chair puts a question > and observes dissent, after due consideration of different opinions, the > Chair should record a decision (possibly after a formal vote) and any > objections, and move on. > This seems to paraphrase the W3C process see http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/#Consensus). I would prefer to simply remove this text and point to the process, rather than trying to figure out whether there is a conflict. Editors are responsible for reflecting the consensus from the Working Group > in the specifications; where editors bring technical solutions in the > specifications that have not been reviewed by the group, these solutions > are annotated to reflect their status. > I don't really understand the clause after the semicolon. Can you expand on what this is intended to mean? > > Contributors are encouraged to bring specific modifications (e.g. as > patches) to the group's specifications to facilitate their review by the > group and eventual integration by the editors. > > -- > > Thanks, > Erik > > *Erik Lagerway <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/lagerway> | *Hookflash > <http://hookflash.com/>* | 1 (855) Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter > <http://twitter.com/elagerway> | WebRTC.is Blog <http://webrtc.is/> * > > On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 11:39 PM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> > wrote: > >> The following people volunteered for the charter task force: >> >> - Andy Hutton <andrew.hutton@unify.com> >> - Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com> >> - Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@microsoft.com> >> - Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> >> - Göran Eriksson <goran.ap.eriksson@ericsson.com> >> - Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com >> >> We think that we’re very close to achieving a consensus on the charter, >> and if the members of this task force can all agree on a single proposal >> (and agree that they agree), we think that this is worth proposing to >> the group and the AC as a proposed “next generation” charter. >> >> Naturally, this group does not have decision-making power; we have asked >> them to propose something they feel that they can all agree with, and >> will then bring that proposal to the WG. >> >> Harald, for the chairs. >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2015 17:17:09 UTC