W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > May 2015

Re: Charter task force - list of volunteers

From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 10:15:58 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBOf_rU74_kvf6pm0FAdQ+v1E1gxg2Qyz_o0rdX0GhxBmg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com>
Cc: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, "Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)" <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com> wrote:

> Thanks Herald,
> More for Dom, I would also ask that we add the Decision Policy copy that I
> inadvertantly removed when doing the Charter diffs be added back in as
> well...
> --

I'm not against having a decision policy but I have some questions about
this one.

> Decision Policy
> As explained in the Process Document ( section 3.3 ), this group will seek
> to make decisions when there is consensus. When the Chair puts a question
> and observes dissent, after due consideration of different opinions, the
> Chair should record a decision (possibly after a formal vote) and any
> objections, and move on.

This seems to paraphrase the W3C process see
I would prefer to simply remove this text and point to the process, rather
than trying to figure out
whether there is a conflict.

Editors are responsible for reflecting the consensus from the Working Group
> in the specifications; where editors bring technical solutions in the
> specifications that have not been reviewed by the group, these solutions
> are annotated to reflect their status.

I don't really understand the clause after the semicolon. Can you expand on
what this
is intended to mean?

Contributors are encouraged to bring specific modifications (e.g. as
> patches) to the group's specifications to facilitate their review by the
> group and eventual integration by the editors.
> --
> Thanks,
> Erik
> *Erik Lagerway <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/lagerway> | *Hookflash
> <http://hookflash.com/>* | 1 (855) Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter
> <http://twitter.com/elagerway> | WebRTC.is Blog <http://webrtc.is/> *
> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 11:39 PM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
> wrote:
>> The following people volunteered for the charter task force:
>> - Andy Hutton <andrew.hutton@unify.com>
>> - Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com>
>> - Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@microsoft.com>
>> - Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
>> - Göran Eriksson <goran.ap.eriksson@ericsson.com>
>> - Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com
>> We think that we’re very close to achieving a consensus on the charter,
>> and if the members of this task force can all agree on a single proposal
>> (and agree that they agree), we think that this is worth proposing to
>> the group and the AC as a proposed “next generation” charter.
>> Naturally, this group does not have decision-making power; we have asked
>> them to propose something they feel that they can all agree with, and
>> will then bring that proposal to the WG.
>> Harald, for the chairs.
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2015 17:17:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:18:06 UTC