Re: Suggestion made during AC review of charter

I agree it's good practice to confirm decisions on the mailing list, but
this
particular text seems extremely problematic. In particular:

"If no objections are raised on the mailing list
within that time, the resolution will be considered to have consensus
as a resolution of the Working Group"

And what if there is *one* objection and 50 people in favor?

-Ekr



On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 17 July 2015 at 12:02, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> wrote:
> > Because I'm reluctant to bring non-absolutely required changes to the
> > charter at this point, I'll likely recommend to the Director we abstain
> from
> > adding it to ours this time around; but I'm submitting it to the group
> who
> > might choose to adopt as its own nevertheless, independently of its
> charter.
> > I'll leave it to the chairs to determine if and how that policy should be
> > adopted.
>
> I think that this is a change worth having, despite the churn.
>
>