I agree it's good practice to confirm decisions on the mailing list, but this particular text seems extremely problematic. In particular: "If no objections are raised on the mailing list within that time, the resolution will be considered to have consensus as a resolution of the Working Group" And what if there is *one* objection and 50 people in favor? -Ekr On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 17 July 2015 at 12:02, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> wrote: > > Because I'm reluctant to bring non-absolutely required changes to the > > charter at this point, I'll likely recommend to the Director we abstain > from > > adding it to ours this time around; but I'm submitting it to the group > who > > might choose to adopt as its own nevertheless, independently of its > charter. > > I'll leave it to the chairs to determine if and how that policy should be > > adopted. > > I think that this is a change worth having, despite the churn. > >Received on Friday, 17 July 2015 23:27:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:18:08 UTC