On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Kostiainen, Anssi < anssi.kostiainen@intel.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > > On 27 Jul 2015, at 12:25, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote: > > > > Chia-Hung, > > > > I do not support adding this item to the work of the WebRTC WG. The WG > > has an enormous amount to do already and this is largely orthogonal to > the > > major thrust of our efforts, which is to enable real-time applications > (e.g., > > video conferencing.) > > > > It's a particularly bad idea to form a task force for this. While perhaps > > necessary at the time for the specific case of getUserMedia, it has been > > a real hassle to have fragmented discussion of WebRTC-related topics. > > All - any concerns with the following proposal? > > * Reuse the existing Media Capture Task Force (joint activity of the > Device API WG and WebRTC WG) for mediacapture-worker [1] initially. The > proposal was introduced to the TF already by CTai, and I don't recall > hearing any concerns on adding it to the TF. > The same concerns I have about adding it to the WebRTC WG apply to adding it ot the TF. It's the same people. * When the Timed Media Working Group has launched, consider migrating [1] > there. AC review of that WG's Charter is ongoing [5], so I'd expect launch > by TPAC if things go very smoothly. > TPAC is now very soon. Why not simply form a mailing list and wait. -Ekr > If you want to pursue standardization of this technology, you should form > > a separate W3C WG. You might also consider taking it to the > > Timed Media WG. > > My expectation is there would be a rather smooth migration path from the > Media Capture Task Force into the Timed Media Working Group for > deliverables that are in scope for both the TF and the Timed Media WG. To > me it seems as if that would be the case: see "Video Stream Functions" in > [6] and "Low Level Audio and Video support" in [7]. > > Thanks, > > -Anssi > > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Chia-Hung Tai <ctai@mozilla.com> > wrote: > > Hi, Chairs, Dom and all, > > > > This is Chia-hung Tai from Mozilla. I would like to add a new working > items, "MediaStream with worker"[1] into WebRTC WG and form a new task > force for this specification. This working item is based on a project > called FoxEye[2]. You can check the use cases in [3]. > > > > This specification extends the Media Capture and Streams specification > to allow JavaScript developers to process video frame data in workers on > the web applications. > > > > I already implement a prototype based on the spec[1]. And get positive > feedbacks from Mozilla DOM peers. I think it should be standardized. You > can see the demo in [4]. Looking forward to hear your voices. Thanks > > > > [1]: http://chiahungtai.github.io/mediacapture-worker/ > > [2]: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Project_FoxEye > > [3]: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Project_FoxEye#Use_Cases > > [4]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prybkXsTGXY > > [5]: > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2015Jul/0020.html > [6]: http://www.w3.org/2015/07/webrtc-charter.html#deliverables > [7]: http://www.w3.org/2015/07/timed-media-wg.html#deliverablesReceived on Friday, 14 August 2015 18:42:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:18:08 UTC