W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > April 2015

Re: Proposal: offerDataChannel in RTCOfferOptions

From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:14:38 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegfkC-L2mEQH9mXa0f9Y+zvuoS6ei2JFPbFfizaETOGccMg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>
Cc: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Benjamin Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
2015-04-28 18:51 GMT+02:00 Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>:
> Also, shouldn't it be offerToReceiveDataChannel?

AFAIK there is no "a=recvonly" for DataChannels.


> I thought the idea here was:
>
>   offerer: "I don't have a datachannel but I don't mind if you do."
>   answerer: "I do have a datachannel for you, thanks for asking!"
>
> That, or the (near) symmetry may be confusing me about what we're solving.

I understand it as follows:

offerer: "I don't want to create a DataChannel right now, but I offer
it to you right now so we can have it ready now if you want, so we
avoid renegotiation".



-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>
Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2015 22:15:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:43 UTC