W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > April 2015

Re: ReplaceTrack and track.id (Re: ReplaceTrack - need to evaluate alternatives)

From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 15:19:08 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUEZPato32C-JEQhPOrzoKs2N_BHO07MLjUU578ippqcJw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Well it's already there via SDP munging :).

And te question isn't whether to allow the JS to choose the MID.  It's
whether to have two IDs/labels (MID + something else), or just one (MID).
If one will work, I prefer one.

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 15 April 2015 at 14:55, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> wrote:
> > Any particular reason?  I know it has some constraints that will catch
> > developers by surprise the first time (basically, no special characters),
> > and it should probably be short (since it will go in header extensions,
> > etc).  But other than that?
>
> There are entropy requirements if we ever want to do partial offer
> answer.  Mostly, it just seems like a feature that we don't need.
>
Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2015 22:20:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:43 UTC