Re: ReplaceTrack and track.id (Re: ReplaceTrack - need to evaluate alternatives) from Martin Thomson on 2015-04-15 (public-webrtc@w3.org from April 2015)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 15:02:27 -0700
To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Cc: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXU_eWngcRS7PCRaMHT2zuV9BBr9hA0Nho80F=e6FEziQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 15 April 2015 at 14:55, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> wrote:
> Any particular reason?  I know it has some constraints that will catch
> developers by surprise the first time (basically, no special characters),
> and it should probably be short (since it will go in header extensions,
> etc).  But other than that?

There are entropy requirements if we ever want to do partial offer
answer.  Mostly, it just seems like a feature that we don't need.

Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2015 22:03:27 UTC