W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > November 2014

Re: Video orientation header ext. - what is it supposed to do?

From: Singh Varun <varun.singh@aalto.fi>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 11:57:12 +0000
To: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
CC: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5CE12F1E-81DC-428E-9461-3799912B9CEF@aalto.fi>
Hi Stefan,

> On 27 Nov 2014, at 14:37, Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> just noted in [1] that a video orientation RTP header extension seem to 
> be assumed.
> Has it ever been discussed what that would mean in the application 
> space? I.e. should it transfer to a track property, should it rotate the 

I don’t remember it being discussed, but I have only recently 
started following the list actively. 

> view shown by the video element automatically (and in that case: how 
> would that interact with CSS rotations), or something else?

True, there should be some discussion somewhere in the document to clarify 
what is the expected behaviour.

It seems a bit odd to read a property on the RTP header extension to 
do this in JS. I would imagine that the UA would automatically do this. 

> Sorry if I missed the discussion, but I don't recollect we talked about 
> this.
> Stefan
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2014Nov/0078.html

Received on Friday, 28 November 2014 11:57:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:42 UTC