- From: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 19:56:31 +0100
- To: public-webrtc@w3.org
Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote: > On 11/13/14, 2:17 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > It's in the nature of this kind of project/report that it's > > developed over an extended period so with a fast-moving area > > like this it's not a surprise that stuff gets outdated. We're > > in any case happy to fix that. > > With respect to the permissions Randell mentions, Firefox never worked > the way the report claims, which make the claims wrong, not outdated. > > I agree it's OK to be wrong and fix things, but that's different from > claiming it used to be right. I wrote the original text on which the section about camera permissions in the STREWS report[1] (section 3.2) is based. Checking my notes, it appears it was in December 2013. I may of course have misinterpreted what I observed, but I was pretty careful. I didn't find an option in Firefox to set permissions permanently for a given site or URL. Firefox also didn't distinguish between HTTP and HTTPS connections, as Chrome did (which is probably a good thing, in terms of user interface, but that aside). And I didn't find a way to revoke permissions, other than by closing the browser window. It is possible that closing just the tab would have been enough. (I didn't have other tabs open so I didn't try that.) But I found no button or menu anywhere in the browser to stop the camera. Firefox is different now: When Firefox 33 asks for permissions, it shows a drop-down menu to choose between one-time and permanent permissions. And it has a button in the location bar to revoke the permissions. Unfortunately, I forgot to write down the version of Firefox I tested. Looking back through my notes, it actually can't be Firefox 28, as our errata say, but probably FF 25 or 26. (We started writing section 3.2 of the report in March, i.e., when FF 28 was out, but it re-used my text from December.) The STREWS report wasn't meant to be published this late and we're glad it is finally done :-) but we'll add an errata to the PDF, or even make an updated version. It is misleading to describe Firefox in the present tense when the described version is actually from a year ago. And b.t.w., thanks for checking the report! [1] http://www.strews.eu/results/91-d12 Bert -- Bert Bos ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/ http://www.w3.org/people/bos W3C/ERCIM bert@w3.org 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93 +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Thursday, 27 November 2014 18:57:00 UTC