W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > June 2014

Re: ICECandidate.candidate syntax is wrong in Chrome

From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:11:31 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBOgJCEmRTyOLvubHpS4=ytgn=q5+gVCsNNoUYfUaVPfZg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Cc: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:

> On 6/23/14 09:32, Emil Ivov wrote:
>> Personally I thought it was an oversight in the FF implementation
> No; starting with the W3C spec (because we're talking about a JS API
> here), we reached the same conclusion as Iñaki did, using the same (rather
> obvious) chain of logic. It is most assuredly not an oversight, as we've
> had to take extra steps to process the candidates that Chrome generates:
> http://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/media/
> webrtc/signaling/src/sipcc/core/gsm/fsmdef.c#4148
>  There were discussions about that at the interim in Boston and then
>> again in Orlando...
> Orlando? Ah, I see the confusion here. Iñaki is talking about a W3C API.
> You're talking about... actually, wait. I don't know what you're talking
> about. The W3C didn't meet in Orlando, and the IETF doesn't specify
> Javascript APIs.

As Adam says, this is totally clear in the W3C API and Firefox is behaving

I don't want to speak for Justin, but IIRC we discussed this a while ago and
he agreed that  it was a bug in Chrome, so I assume it's just an oversight
it hasn't been fixed.

Received on Monday, 23 June 2014 18:12:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:17:59 UTC