- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 12:22:30 -0700
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Cc: Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, tim panton <thp@westhawk.co.uk>, "Makaraju, Maridi Raju (Raju)" <Raju.Makaraju@alcatel-lucent.com>, Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>, Kiran Kumar Guduru <kiran.guduru@samsung.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 14 June 2014 02:19, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: >> FWIW, I'm with Tim on this one. I also think it makes it clearer - >> either the UA throws, or it sends all symbols. > > FWIW, I think the spec will be simpler if we throw > IllegalCharacterException on strings that contain any character except > [0-9A-Da-d*#,], and have no special treatment at sendout time (illegal > characters can't occur there). FWIW, FWIW isn't necessary. This is simply good design. Having something blow up early avoids nasty deferred surprises.
Received on Saturday, 14 June 2014 19:22:57 UTC