On 2014-01-24 07:48, Adam Bergkvist wrote: > On 2014-01-09 11:39, Michael Tuexen wrote: >> I just realise that maxRetransmitTime, since this time does not limit >> the time spent >> on retransmissions, but it limits the lifetime of the message. So a >> name lime >> maxLifeTime or so makes more sense. > > In this case, maxLifeTime seem like a more descriptive name. > > I'll edit that into the spec if no one has any strong objections. > > /Adam > It is still a parameter for the transport layer, right? So, it means: If this message is not successfully transmitted within the maxLifeTime time interval, then it may be dropped from the transmission queue. And it is not an application level parameter. So it does not mean for the receiver: "Do not use this message after the maxLifeTime has expired" If you agree, please make that distinction clear in your edit. /GunnarReceived on Friday, 24 January 2014 09:12:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:17:54 UTC