W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > April 2014

Re: Update of RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal

From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:34:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUHgmmggFdU2gBgs9-_TPm3kutz=WCd+cnQmv4sw-dPdCg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote:

> I like this.  I think that this makes for a good starting point for
> building the sorts of features Suhas was talking about enabling.
>
> Two comments:
>
> >   double               priority = 1.0;  // relative priority of this
> encoding
>
> This concerns me.  I'm not sure how I would convert a double-precision
> number into any of the primitive we've discussed thus far.
>
> > partial interface RTCPeerConnection {
>
> Does this need a lookup (track -> sender/receiver) ?
>


​Couldn't you just iterate over the senders and receivers and check .track?
 It sounds like a few lines of JS.
Received on Monday, 28 April 2014 16:36:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:38 UTC