Re: Update of RTCRtpSender "doohickey" proposal

I like this.  I think that this makes for a good starting point for
building the sorts of features Suhas was talking about enabling.

Two comments:

>   double               priority = 1.0;  // relative priority of this encoding

This concerns me.  I'm not sure how I would convert a double-precision
number into any of the primitive we've discussed thus far.

> partial interface RTCPeerConnection {

Does this need a lookup (track -> sender/receiver) ?

Received on Monday, 28 April 2014 16:27:26 UTC