W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > October 2013

Re: stats api webidl implementers feedback

From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 08:14:24 +0200
Message-ID: <5268BAC0.2030202@alvestrand.no>
To: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>, Göran Eriksson AP <goran.ap.eriksson@ericsson.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Missed one question earlier:

you added "unsigned long long priority". 64-bit? What does this 
correspond to?

On 10/23/2013 05:28 PM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote:
>>> dictionary RTCIceCandidatePairStats : RTCStats {
>>> - DOMString componentId;
>>> + DOMString candidatePairId;
>>
>> Don't understand this change. componentId is needed to group all the 
>> candidate pairs that are
>> linked to the same component. The candidate pair already has an ID - 
>> the "id" field.
>
> OK, thanks. Probably a misunderstanding. This is an ICE "component"?
>
>>
>>> DOMString localCandidateId;
>>> DOMString remoteCandidateId;
>>> + RTCStatsIceCandidatePairState state;
>>> - boolean writable; // Has gotten ACK to an ICE request
>>> - boolean readable; // Has gotten a valid incoming ICE request
>>
>> Where will you keep the information about whether a candidate pair is 
>> working or not, if you
>> don't keep it here?
>
> Not sure, will check with the person who did this part. :-)
>
>>
>>> + unsigned long long priority;
>>> + boolean nominated; // Internal?
>>> + boolean selected; // Internal?
>>> -}
>>> +};
Received on Thursday, 24 October 2013 06:14:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:36 UTC