Re: Missing Features: Stream Control from Harald Alvestrand on 2013-10-21 (public-webrtc@w3.org from October 2013)

From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:22:18 +0200
To: public-webrtc@w3.org
Message-ID: <52651C7A.9000500@alvestrand.no>

On 10/18/2013 07:45 PM, Aymeric Vitte wrote:
>
> Le 18/10/2013 19:31, Stefan Håkansson LK a écrit :
>> I think we're talking about completely different streams, and what Adam
>> is proposing is applicable for MediaStreamTracks in the context of a
>> WebRTC PeerConnection.
> I don't see why, a stream is a stream, this would be strange that a 
> Streams API is defined and WebRTC is using something different, 
> moreover that this does not change the spec, the spec just has to 
> support Streams
>
A MediaStream MediaStreamTrack as specified in this specification isn't 
what people are talking about in any of the zillion different proposals 
that use the name Stream.

Please don't use the name Stream without a pointer to the specific 
proposal you're naming. The name has been used too many times for sanity.

Received on Monday, 21 October 2013 12:22:41 UTC