W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > November 2013

Re: Using tracks instead of streams

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:21:05 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVhoRh81Yqucop4CZH86wqBBVWLzSigb0frBX=PNZZjRA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
Cc: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>, Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 14 November 2013 08:06, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:
> sure but what would it look like to set up a simple audio call at both the caller and callee side from JS point of view, just trying to get my head around what you are proposing.

Given that existing applications don't need to change, the example
could be just the same as any of the many simple examples that are
already out there.

If you wanted extra control (hold, etc...), then I'm sure that you can
work out how to acquire the objects you need.  It involves a little
bit of rummaging through collections, but that's just a natural
consequence of building APIs with god objects.
Received on Thursday, 14 November 2013 18:21:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:36 UTC