W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > November 2013

Re: Using tracks instead of streams

From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:06:22 +0000
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
CC: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>, Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <65C870AA-120C-4339-9EA8-8D5BC615C1E5@cisco.com>

On Nov 13, 2013, at 4:57 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 13 November 2013 14:39, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:
>> what does it like for something that is sendrecv stream.
> 
> a=sendrecv is an SDP construct.  I'd imagine that there would be a
> sender and a receiver that get all chummy in SDP, but to force
> chumminess upon them would be unnatural.

sure but what would it look like to set up a simple audio call at both the caller and callee side from JS point of view, just trying to get my head around what you are proposing. 
Received on Thursday, 14 November 2013 16:06:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:36 UTC