W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > June 2013

Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API?

From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:09:47 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxv7uN8vQaiu6oo0WfSoKGLwTYB0AFXQcSq5BM4Xkvo==A@mail.gmail.com>
To: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
Cc: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>, piranna@gmail.com, Frédéric Luart <frederic.luart@apizee.com>, public-webrtc@w3.org, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:58 AM, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> wrote:

>
>     That's fine and well but you've got to start somewhere. What's the
> harm in collecting use-cases and building an API on top of SDP for now?
> Even if you're right, it's hard to convince people to make such a large
> leap at once. Let's see what this API ends up looking like, and we can then
> revisit the idea of taking it to a higher level.
>
>     Long term, you will need to come up with a *concrete* proposal for an
> API that works for signaling protocols that require Offer/Answer and yet
> doesn't expose those details to end-users. Like I said, let's start small
> and build up to these goals.
>
>
I would argue that this is a waste of time since we need to decouple
current peer connection object, not change the object passed to it. Putting
object wrapper on SDP will get us nowhere.
_____________
Roman Shpount
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2013 15:10:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:33 UTC