On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:58 AM, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> wrote: > > That's fine and well but you've got to start somewhere. What's the > harm in collecting use-cases and building an API on top of SDP for now? > Even if you're right, it's hard to convince people to make such a large > leap at once. Let's see what this API ends up looking like, and we can then > revisit the idea of taking it to a higher level. > > Long term, you will need to come up with a *concrete* proposal for an > API that works for signaling protocols that require Offer/Answer and yet > doesn't expose those details to end-users. Like I said, let's start small > and build up to these goals. > > I would argue that this is a waste of time since we need to decouple current peer connection object, not change the object passed to it. Putting object wrapper on SDP will get us nowhere. _____________ Roman Shpount
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2013 15:10:19 UTC