W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > June 2013

RE: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API?

From: Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku) <snandaku@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 03:47:21 +0000
To: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <37D91FC30D69DE43B61E5EEADD959F1807D00ED1@xmb-aln-x12.cisco.com>

My 2 cents ..

I personally dont feel why would one want to modify SDP frequently than supporting few special cases. Also once the APIs, SDP Usages and constraints are finalized, i envision there will be much lesser need to modify SDP by hand.

Needing to have a object wrapper is fine by not sure if it is a MUST requirement.


From: cowwoc [cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 6:10 PM
To: public-webrtc@w3.org
Subject: Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API?

     +1. I understand that the spec authors are determined to stick with
SDP and that's okay, but can we get the specification to explicitly
state that SDP arguments are to be treated as read-only opaque tokens at
this time? This leaves the door open to providing an object-oriented API
for mutating SDP at some future time.


On 14/06/2013 3:14 PM, piranna@gmail.com wrote:
> Isn't there somewhere a wrapper for SDPs? It's crazy trying to work
> with them, and nothing have been decided yet about using a more
> object-oriented API that modify the SPD strings by hand, while it has
> been agreed several times on this list about SDPs should be
> implementation detail... Also, such wrapper should be a basis where to
> start to develop that higher-level API...
> --
> "Si quieres viajar alrededor del mundo y ser invitado a hablar en un
> monton de sitios diferentes, simplemente escribe un sistema operativo
> Unix."
>  Linus Tordvals, creador del sistema operativo Linux
Received on Saturday, 15 June 2013 03:47:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:33 UTC