Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API?

     +1. I understand that the spec authors are determined to stick with 
SDP and that's okay, but can we get the specification to explicitly 
state that SDP arguments are to be treated as read-only opaque tokens at 
this time? This leaves the door open to providing an object-oriented API 
for mutating SDP at some future time.


On 14/06/2013 3:14 PM, wrote:
> Isn't there somewhere a wrapper for SDPs? It's crazy trying to work
> with them, and nothing have been decided yet about using a more
> object-oriented API that modify the SPD strings by hand, while it has
> been agreed several times on this list about SDPs should be
> implementation detail... Also, such wrapper should be a basis where to
> start to develop that higher-level API...
> --
> "Si quieres viajar alrededor del mundo y ser invitado a hablar en un
> monton de sitios diferentes, simplemente escribe un sistema operativo
> Unix."
>  Linus Tordvals, creador del sistema operativo Linux

Received on Saturday, 15 June 2013 01:12:15 UTC