- From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 11:43:10 -0400
- To: public-webrtc@w3.org
+1. SDP should be an implementation detail.
Gili
On 04/06/2013 11:23 AM, piranna@gmail.com wrote:
> What's the status with SDPs? I remeber people claiming for a more
> object-oriented API and leverage plain SDPs as an internal feature,
> not requiring the user to work directly with it. Have it been
> progresed something this issue?
>
> 2013/6/4 Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>:
>> On 6/3/13 09:37, Adam Bergkvist wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> A new version of the editor's draft is available.
>>>
>>> Dated version:
>>> http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/archives/20130603/webrtc.html
>>> Living document: http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/webrtc.html
>>>
>>> Changes include:
>>> Added IceRestart constraint.
>>> Big updates on DataChannel API to use new channel setup procedures.
>>>
>>> Please review and provide feedback.
>>
>> Back in January, we had a couple of exchanges on the list about
>> addIceCandidate needing an error callback. There was no opposition and at
>> least weak support for doing so. Can we make sure that this makes it in the
>> next revision?
>>
>> /a
>>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2013 15:44:42 UTC