W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > December 2013

RE: Future F2F meetings?

From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 12:51:13 +0000
To: "Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@unify.com>, Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C5E25E2@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>


Assuming this would be a joint meeting with the IETF RTCWEB WG, there is a 3GPP meeting in US 19-23rd May, and from my perspective it would be good if we could avoid those days. But, from a traveling perspective, the week after (or, before) would be ideal :)



From: Hutton, Andrew [andrew.hutton@unify.com]
Sent: Monday, 23 December 2013 11:42 AM
To: Stefan Håkansson LK; public-media-capture@w3.org; public-webrtc@w3.org
Subject: RE: Future F2F meetings?

Hi All,

If late May is the preferred time slot for this maybe co-locating with the IMTC SuperOp would be an option many of the industries Video experts will be at the event and at least a few of the working group participants.


I think it is always a good idea to co-locate to reduce travel and increase participation.

The IMTC is also looking to add some WebRTC testing to the event.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Håkansson LK [mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com]
> Sent: 20 December 2013 13:26
> To: public-media-capture@w3.org; public-webrtc@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Future F2F meetings?
> There was so far no response to this mail.
> But in the interest of making progress, we will start to plan for a F2F
> meeting in London (preliminary for the Media Capture TF and the WebRTC
> WG) the weekend after the London IETF meeting (meaning that the dates
> in
> question are March 7th - 9th). Let us know if you think this is a bad
> idea.
> The IETF rtcweb WG is also discussing a f2f meeting in late May, our
> idea is to make this a joint meeting with W3C WebRTC WG and Media
> Capture TF.
> Stefan for the chairs
> On 2013-12-12 13:07, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote:
> > Sorry for the cross posting, but this relates to both the TF and the
> WG.
> >
> > We think that f2f meetings are helpful in progressing the work - it
> > gives much higher bandwidth for the discussion. We'd like to get your
> > view about arranging f2f meetings during the first half of next year
> > (and our thinking is that both the Media Cap TF and the WebRTC WG
> should
> > meet).
> >
> > - One possibility would be to have a meeting (in London) the weekend
> > after the London IETF meeting, March 8-9 2014. The advantage would be
> > that many of the participants in our work would be there anyway
> because
> > of the IETF meeting.
> >
> > - Another would be to arrange a separate meeting in (perhaps) May
> next
> > year, possibly jointly with the rtcweb WG of the IETF.
> >
> > What do you think? Would you join? Should we do one of them (which?),
> > none or both?
> >
> > Stefan for the chairs
> >
> > P.S. I know that the WebRTC F2F in Shenzhen did not work that well
> due
> > to some special circumstances - but F2F meetings are usually very
> > productive IMO
> >
> >
Received on Monday, 23 December 2013 12:51:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:37 UTC