- From: Hutton, Andrew <andrew.hutton@unify.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 09:42:05 +0000
- To: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Hi All, If late May is the preferred time slot for this maybe co-locating with the IMTC SuperOp would be an option many of the industries Video experts will be at the event and at least a few of the working group participants. http://www.imtc.org/event/imtc-superop-2014/ I think it is always a good idea to co-locate to reduce travel and increase participation. The IMTC is also looking to add some WebRTC testing to the event. Regards Andy > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Håkansson LK [mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com] > Sent: 20 December 2013 13:26 > To: public-media-capture@w3.org; public-webrtc@w3.org > Subject: Re: Future F2F meetings? > > There was so far no response to this mail. > > But in the interest of making progress, we will start to plan for a F2F > meeting in London (preliminary for the Media Capture TF and the WebRTC > WG) the weekend after the London IETF meeting (meaning that the dates > in > question are March 7th - 9th). Let us know if you think this is a bad > idea. > > The IETF rtcweb WG is also discussing a f2f meeting in late May, our > idea is to make this a joint meeting with W3C WebRTC WG and Media > Capture TF. > > Stefan for the chairs > > On 2013-12-12 13:07, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote: > > Sorry for the cross posting, but this relates to both the TF and the > WG. > > > > We think that f2f meetings are helpful in progressing the work - it > > gives much higher bandwidth for the discussion. We'd like to get your > > view about arranging f2f meetings during the first half of next year > > (and our thinking is that both the Media Cap TF and the WebRTC WG > should > > meet). > > > > - One possibility would be to have a meeting (in London) the weekend > > after the London IETF meeting, March 8-9 2014. The advantage would be > > that many of the participants in our work would be there anyway > because > > of the IETF meeting. > > > > - Another would be to arrange a separate meeting in (perhaps) May > next > > year, possibly jointly with the rtcweb WG of the IETF. > > > > What do you think? Would you join? Should we do one of them (which?), > > none or both? > > > > Stefan for the chairs > > > > P.S. I know that the WebRTC F2F in Shenzhen did not work that well > due > > to some special circumstances - but F2F meetings are usually very > > productive IMO > > > > >
Received on Monday, 23 December 2013 09:42:28 UTC