W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > December 2013

Re: Future F2F meetings?

From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 13:47:06 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-0ojejDXiuLWNYN6Hg179xqWPVmyADvZRbNgwg0+-oDRw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
Cc: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
I agree we should try to have an interim F2F meeting. I am flexible as to
the exact date.

On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com
> wrote:

> On Dec 20, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
> > Why?
> >
> > Because Fridays of IETF week are less useful. Because everyone is grumpy
> and frazzled and operating at a diminished mental capacity. Because nothing
> useful happens when people are in that state of body and mind. It's the
> elephant in the room; while we don't acknowledge it much anymore,
> experienced chairs know that it means to have a meeting at the end of IETF
> week.
> >
> > And then we want to stand up and choose exactly that suboptimal time to
> schedule a meeting? There's no better way to bias for failure.
> I will be pretty much brain dead by the friday of IETF. The few weeks
> before IETF I find very busy with IETF work. I don't expect to be very
> useful on the Saturday. I prefer not to spend two weekends in a row away
> from home (and I have to be at the IETF for meeting the previous weekend).
> If we have the meeting, I will probably come but my preference would be
> some other time.
Received on Friday, 20 December 2013 21:47:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:37 UTC