W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > December 2013

Re: Please review the updated Streams API

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 06:30:08 -0500
Message-ID: <52A063C0.1080102@nokia.com>
To: Rob Manson <robman@mob-labs.com>, public-webrtc@w3.org
Thanks Rob!

All - please send comments about the Streams API to 
public-webapps@w3.org (archive 
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/>).

-AB

On 12/5/13 5:06 AM, ext Rob Manson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> if you didn't see my earlier post to public-media-capture, there's an 
> updated W3C Streams API draft available for review and I've been asked 
> to also notify this WG to get your feedback on it's implications for 
> MediaStream, MediaStreamTrack, RTCPeerConnection and RTCDataChannels.
>
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/streams-api/raw-file/tip/Overview.htm
>
> I'd encourage you all to review it and provide any feedback or 
> thoughts you might have.
>
> As I mentioned in my post to public-media-capture, Feras and Takeshi 
> have been doing a great job integrating and filtering all the feedback 
> they've received and I've personally been pushing for as much focus on 
> making it as effective and useful for post-processing as possible. I'm 
> sure many of you here have a different perspective they would find 
> very valuable.
>
> Below is the email Feras sent to describe where this work is up to.
>
> roBman
>
>
>> On 12/4/13 11:27 AM, ext Feras Moussa wrote:
>> The editors of the Streams API have reached a milestone where we feel
>> many of the major issues that have been identified thus far are now
>> resolved and incorporated in the editors draft.
>>
>> The editors draft [1] has been heavily updated and reviewed the past
>> few weeks to address all concerns raised, including:
>> 1. Separation into two distinct types -ReadableByteStream and
>> WritableByteStream
>> 2. Explicit support for back pressure management
>> 3. Improvements to help with pipe( ) and flow-control management
>> 4. Updated spec text and diagrams for further clarifications
>>
>> There are still a set of bugs being tracked in bugzilla. We would like
>> others to please review the updated proposal, and provide any feedback
>> they may have (or file bugs).
>>
>> Thanks.
>> -Feras
>>
>>
>> [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/streams-api/raw-file/tip/Overview.htm
>
Received on Thursday, 5 December 2013 11:39:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:37 UTC