Re: Poll for preferred API alternative

On 09/06/2012 06:30 PM, Hutton, Andrew wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I think the discussion on SDP issues raises an important point as some 
> people might be of the impression that the PeerConnectionAPI is almost 
> complete but reality is that the SDP blob that comes out of it is not 
> specified and it is likely that it will end up looking quite different 
> to SDP that existing implementations are familiar with. We are 
> therefore quite some way from a standard API that will be 
> interoperable between different browsers and legacy implementations 
> without a lot of tweaking and knowledge of SDP in the application.
>
I've heard this theory advanced.

I've not heard it advanced by the people who have written the 
applications that interwork between the present, early WebRTC 
implementations and existing, legacy SDP-using devices, such as sipml5.
What comes out of Chrome is SDP, and conforms to the SDP RFCs. (If not - 
file bugs!)

I'd like this line of argument supported by "when I fire Chrome browser 
SDP at <device>, it doesn't interwork because of <reason>". That's much 
more actionable than "I think".

           Harald