- From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:54:47 +0200
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
I'd like to discuss this topic at the next phone call - I don't think the issue is choosing one. I think the issue is discussing what we like about both and seeing if we can find a way to have our cake and eat it too. On Mar 20, 2012, at 17:15 , Harald Alvestrand wrote: > List, > > we now have two member contributions suggesting changes to the PeerConnection API in order to align with the JSEP direction suggested in the IETF: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2012Mar/0049.html (from Adam) > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2012Mar/0064.html (from Cullen) > > In order to make quick progress, the chairs aim to call for the incorporation of one of these in the core document as soon as consensus is detected in the WG; if it's not obvious before what the > consensus is, the chairs aim to make a call one way or the other based on the list traffic up to ca March 30 (this is just after the IETF meeting, so people taking the opportunity for face-to-face discussion can report on those discussions here). > > All list members who have reviewed both documents are encouraged to > state their opinion on the list. > > Harald and Stefan >
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2012 12:55:24 UTC