Re: JSEP API changes - choosing a path forward

I'd like to discuss this topic at the next phone call - I don't think the issue is choosing one. I think the issue is discussing what we like about both and seeing if we can find a way to have our cake and eat it too. 


On Mar 20, 2012, at 17:15 , Harald Alvestrand wrote:

> List,
> 
> we now have two member contributions suggesting changes to the PeerConnection API in order to align with the JSEP direction suggested in the IETF:
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2012Mar/0049.html (from Adam)
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2012Mar/0064.html (from Cullen)
> 
> In order to make quick progress, the chairs aim to call for the incorporation of one of these in the core document as soon as consensus is detected in the WG; if it's not obvious before what the
> consensus is, the chairs aim to make a call one way or the other based on the list traffic up to ca March 30 (this is just after the IETF meeting, so people taking the opportunity for face-to-face discussion can report on those discussions here).
> 
> All list members who have reviewed both documents are encouraged to
> state their opinion on the list.
> 
>                   Harald and Stefan
>