I am definitely in favor of the suggested behavior, the current just feels clunky. /Tommy On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 02:11, Soo-Hyun Choi <soohyun.choi@cl.cam.ac.uk>wrote: > Harald, > > > From the perspective of enabling temporary muting of a track, it seems like >> it would be better if the text had said: >> >> When a track in a MediaStream<http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/webrtc.html#mediastream> >> parent is disabled, any MediaStreamTrack<http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/webrtc.html#mediastreamtrack> >> objects corresponding to the tracks in any MediaStream<http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/webrtc.html#mediastream> >> objects that were created from parent stop sending data, although their >> "enabled" status does not change. If a disabled track in a MediaStream<http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/webrtc.html#mediastream> >> parent is re-enabled, data starts flowing on the downstream >> MediaStreamTrack objects, as long as their *enabled* attribute has the >> value "true". >> >> What do other people think - what would it be best if the spec said? >> >> > > Agreed - I was reading this part of the spec yesterday, and had the exactly > same thought like you. Your modified text looks much clearer. > > > Soo-Hyun > > -- Tommy Widenflycht, Senior Software Engineer Google Sweden AB, Kungsbron 2, SE-11122 Stockholm, Sweden Org. nr. 556656-6880 And yes, I have to include the above in every outgoing email according to EU law.
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2011 17:47:02 UTC