W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > November 2011

Re: Mail to the list hanging in the server

From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:12:02 +0100
Message-ID: <4EC159F2.9070607@w3.org>
To: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
CC: public-webrtc@w3.org
Note that normally only messages from first-time posters (people who have never posted to a W3C mailing-list before) may be hanging in practice. They do because they need to be manually approved as part of the archive approval system.

This usually goes fast enough to be unnoticeable, but it may occasionally take up to 2 days, especially when the message arrives on a Friday, and especially when that Friday is a bank holiday for most of the W3C team...

Francois.


On 11/14/2011 05:06 PM, Randell Jesup wrote:
> WARNING:
>
> I noticed this message seemed to have come in at an odd time, and I looked at the headers. It appears that this message sat in the w3 servers for over a day (closer to two!) before moving to a different w3 server:
>
> Received: from www-data by jessica.w3.org with local (Exim 4.69)
> (envelope-from <alexn74@gmail.com>)
> id 1RPgmO-0000x0-T7 for public-webrtc@listhub.w3.org; Sun,
> 13 Nov 2011 20:35:52 +0000
> Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp
> (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <alexn74@gmail.com>)
> id 1ROiin-00040C-CL for public-webrtc@listhub.w3.org; Fri,
> 11 Nov 2011 04:28:09 +0000
>
> Delivery before that and after that was timely.
>
> So, word of warning, messages may be hanging with no notice!
>
> ...
> Subject: Re: Proposal: Media streams, media stream tracks and channels
> ...
> On 11/10/2011 11:27 PM, Alex wrote:
>> Yeh, I understand that. Just wanted to point out that semantic of
>> identifiers you've chosen intersect with what we deal in other standards
>> (MPEG container for instance) and real life analogues. So hierarchy of
>> Stream, Track and Channel is unclear without reading the doc (which is a
>> good thing sometimes). Personally I would prefer
>> Stream->Substream->SubstreamChannel hierarchy or similar. For instance
>> MPEG-4 container has a notion of tracks (trak block). In audio world
>> tracks have a default meaning as well.
>
> [SNIP]
>
>
Received on Monday, 14 November 2011 18:12:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:26 UTC