W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > November 2011

Re: Semantics question for onaddstream() callback

From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:00:56 +0100
Message-ID: <4EC14948.8000101@ericsson.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
CC: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
On 11/14/2011 04:31 PM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> On 11/14/2011 08:30 PM, Justin Uberti wrote:
>> What about when a new stream is added to a participant, e.g. a
>> presentation?
> I dont think we have a concept called "participant".
> Do you mean a new MediaStreamTrack inside a MediaStream?
> That's what I'd find most natural to represent "this user, who
> previously sent me voice and video, is now also sending me a
> presentation"; YMMV.

Or it could be a new MediaStream object. I think it's up to the web 
application to introduce the participant concept if needed.

Received on Monday, 14 November 2011 17:05:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:26 UTC