W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > November 2011

Mail to the list hanging in the server

From: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:06:43 -0500
Message-ID: <4EC13C93.8000003@jesup.org>
To: public-webrtc@w3.org

I noticed this message seemed to have come in at an odd time, and I 
looked at the headers.  It appears that this message sat in the w3 
servers for over a day (closer to two!) before moving to a different w3 

Received: from www-data by jessica.w3.org with local (Exim 4.69)
  (envelope-from <alexn74@gmail.com>)
  id 1RPgmO-0000x0-T7	for public-webrtc@listhub.w3.org; Sun,
  13 Nov 2011 20:35:52 +0000
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([])	by frink.w3.org with esmtp
  (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from <alexn74@gmail.com>)
  id 1ROiin-00040C-CL	for public-webrtc@listhub.w3.org; Fri,
  11 Nov 2011 04:28:09 +0000

Delivery before that and after that was timely.

So, word of warning, messages may be hanging with no notice!

Subject: Re: Proposal: Media streams, media stream tracks and channels
On 11/10/2011 11:27 PM, Alex wrote:
>     Yeh, I understand that. Just wanted to point out that semantic of
> identifiers you've chosen intersect with what we deal in other standards
> (MPEG container for instance) and real life analogues. So hierarchy of
> Stream, Track and Channel is unclear without reading the doc (which is a
> good thing sometimes). Personally I would prefer
> Stream->Substream->SubstreamChannel hierarchy or similar. For instance
> MPEG-4 container has a notion of tracks (trak block). In audio world
> tracks have a default meaning as well.


Randell Jesup
Received on Monday, 14 November 2011 16:08:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:26 UTC