- From: Christopher Blizzard <blizzard@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:30:50 -0700
- To: public-webrtc@w3.org
On 7/14/2011 3:41 PM, Ralph Giles wrote: > > s and developers alike. > Yes, of course. I agree those are important, exciting features for > mobile user agents. However, as far as our API requirements go, I > believe the question is not whether a user can switch between cameras, > but whether web content can have a share in that decision. > > As Ian suggests, does a web page need to pass hints to a browser which > camera it expects a user to prefer? Must in-page controls be able to > switch the camera? Can that be left to the user-agent? > > Personally, I think user experience can be improved when the api > offers all this data, but we have a lot to do already without > standardizing an extensible structure for such things at this stage of > our implementation experience. > > -r > I think that we shouldn't be pushing so much of this off to the agent. I want people to be able to create apps that are immersive, full screen and expose that stuff through beautiful UI. An interrupt-driven UI from the browser that's popup-based (OK to use the camera? which one? you want to change cameras? oh, you're gonna have to do that from a menu somewhere) isn't a great experience. I think once you're allowed to transmit video data it doesn't matter all that much which camera you're using. So I certainly fall on the side of exposing a lot of this information through APIs since that puts the app in control of the experience instead of the UA, which only has a few options for jamming itself into the experience. --Chris
Received on Friday, 15 July 2011 00:31:28 UTC