Re: Poll for date / location for RTCWeb Interim meeting

On 11/30/2011 07:05 PM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
> Yes - though I would be an observer not a W3C member, so my interest may not matter for your count. (I'm not sure how such counting is done in W3C)
I would be surprised if we needed to make a real count in order to make 
a decision.
People have spoken up, so we know they got the message, and those who 
have spoken up have been supportive. If someone would come up with a 
really powerful reason not to have this, I would have expected to hear 
by now.

You're welcome to attend!
> -hadriel
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2011, at 12:49 PM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>
>> For the W3C WEBRTC folks only: Is there interest in arranging a W3C WG interim in conjunction with this meeting?
>>
>> I imagine it would take the form of allocating half a day or so out of the two to the W3C meeting - I can't quite imagine spending *three* days closely focused on RTCWEB/WEBRTC issues!
>>
>> (The time allocation can of course be adjusted to fit what we feel is the most sensible allocation based on the needs at the time.)
>> All in favour - say "yes" (if there is no interest, we won't do it, of course).
>>
>>                  Harald, for the chairs
>>
>> On 11/23/2011 10:34 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote:
>>> We have 5 different dates to choose from and three locations to choose from. The last date set proposed has only one location, Boston, so it could be aligned with the proposed CLUE meeting. This would mean, however, that it would be very close to the deadline for drafts for IETF 83.
>>>
>>> Please mark you preferred dates / locations as green "yes", make ones that you would come to but not preferred as yellow "(Yes)", and the ones where you would not come as red "No".
>>>
>>> This poll will close at the end of the day Dec 2.
>>>
>>> http://www.doodle.com/mivaxme6zwgrd5dy
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Cullen, Magnus,&   Ted
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Received on Thursday, 1 December 2011 10:26:58 UTC