Re: Agenda, February 11

I will be 15 mins late.

On Thursday, 11 February 2016, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
wrote:

> Overarching items:
>
> - Publication methods. It seems that echidna wants to do away with not
> only the WD/ED distinction, but even with the ED/tip-of-tree distinction
> (publish new WD every time we commit to tree). Is this correct, and do
> we want to strive for it?
>
> (Yesterday, philipj spent extra time being confused because we didn't).
>
> Endgame for mediacapture-main: Do we know of items that are outstanding
> but untracked?
>
> Mediacapture-Main:
>
> PRs:
>
> #307 Add text about Capabilities and features that can only in mo (adam-be)
> Any way to address Jan-Ivar's commentary?
>
> #313 Extend iframe with a new allowusermedia attribute (issue: #2 (adam-be)
> I think we should merge. (text nits)
>
> Issues:
>
> #268 Iframe sandboxing options for gUM (adam-be) - PR exists
> #296 How to handle known but unsupported constraints (adam-be) - PR exists
> #305 Use permissions API model for describing permissions? (alvestrand)
> - Waiting for mlamouri to respond to PR.
>
> Webrtc-PC:
>
> PRs:
>
> #317 Make RTCDataChannels Transferable (stefhak)
> LATER
>
> #434 Change setParameters call to be Async  (aboba)
> Cullen is silent. What to do? Bernard, can we merge?
>
> #445 Make DataChannels Transferable and explain the implications (stefhak)
> LATER
>
> #463 Add more explicit language about transceivers, MIDs and roll
> (pthatcherg)
> Waiting for Peter.
>
> #466 Use an enum to describe directionality of RTP Stream (adam-be)
> #467 Use enum for voiceActivityDetection (adam-be)
> #471 Use enum for RTCDataChannel’s ordered attribute (adam-be)
> This is the "enum complex". Any list discussion generated?
>
> #475 Definition of Active for an RTCRtpReceiver (pthatcherg)
> Peter?
>
> #489 getSenders/getReceivers: optional kind parameter ()
> Suggest closing this as "won't do" (see #488 discussion)
>
> #494 proposed fix to issue #492 (adam-be)
> Hm. Jan-Ivar's commentary seems sensible for this one.
>
> Issues:
>
> See dashboard:
>
> https://www.w3.org/Tools/gh-dashboard/?repo=w3c%2Fwebrtc-pc&template=templates%2Flabel-state.html
>
> Selected items:
>
> Unassigned (2)
> [495] File a WebIDL issue to add the DOMException names WebRTC needs
> 0 comments - last update: a day ago - assignee: none
> [496] Certificate API: Do we need certificate introspection?
> 3 comments - last update: a day ago - assignee: none
>
> [142] "Hold" unspecified
> 13 comments - last update: 16 days ago - assignee: aboba
> Should we break this up? The problem seems unspecified itself.
>
>
>

-- 
*Hookflash* <http://hookflash.com/> | m 1.604.562.8647 | erik@hookflash.com
| @elagerway <http://twitter.com/elagerway>