Re: Agenda, June 11

If time permits, I'd be interested in getting views on how we use the 
planned f2f in September best (and how to prepare for it).

On 10/06/15 21:08, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> Overarching items, FYI stuff:
>
> - Info: We're testing the state of things on registry. It looks like
> we're sharply divided.
> - Chairs have a call scheduled with the audio folks today to discuss
> their concern about more device info. Worried about lack of engagement
> from WebRTC folks.
> - Some advice received from Addison on internationalization of labels.
> - We're waiting for Peter to finish the invited expert paperwork
>
> Mediacapture-main
> =================
> Pull requests:
> - #170 PermissionDenied and friends - Dan?
> - #171 HTML 5.1 - Stefan?
> - #177 Add latency constraints - suggestion accepted - ready to go?
> - #181 Remove text about firing event handlers - Dan asked to review
> - #182 Move sanity tests to sync section of gUM - Adam, status?
> - #183 Remove MediaRecorder - I think we forgot to delete that when we
> forked.
>
> Issues:
> - #118 Practical algorithm - HTA, you're slow.
> - #127 Timeout - freezer. Chairs have not yet established freezebox.
> - #161 Remove direct assignment - see #171
> - #162 MediaStreamError - see #170
> - #173 Minimum length for deviceid - list discussion
> - #174 More sync getUserMedia - see #182
> - #176 Constrainable pattern - nothing from Jan-Ivar
> - #180 Switch from "asynchronously" to "in parallel" (have a hard time
> caring, but why not?)
>
> WebRTC-PC
> =========
> Pull requests:
> - #29 still sad
> - #195 ReplaceTrack
> - #222 Operations array
> - #225 Pending and current
> - #228 QoS API (attribute) - competes with #234
> - #229 Removing optionality from constructors
> - #234 RTCRtpParameters and friends (get/modify/set) - pthatcher has
> done good in starting discussion
> - #235 Modernize getStats - do we need backwards compatibility?
>
> Bugs:
> We need to throw some in the icebox. Now that we seem to agree on an 1.1
> charter, that might be closer than before (the icebox will be opened).
>
> Candidates: All the "enhancements".
> Of those, I think we have to add:
>
> - #187 prevent tracks from being renegotiatied
> - #179 private IP addresses
> - #160 access for remote/local SDP (PR #225)
> - #143 TURN auth failure causes event
> - #133 Streams that become isolated generate errors
> - #129 Encoding parameters (for priority & hold only) (PR #234)
>
> Maybe #130 - codec capabilities.
>
> Should be plenty of work for an hour.
>
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 11 June 2015 09:26:08 UTC