- From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:54:19 +0000
- To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- CC: "webrtc-editors@alvestrand.no" <webrtc-editors@alvestrand.no>, "Peter Thatcher" <pthatcher@google.com>
I'm glad this is getting straighten out.. But I'm less worried about this particular thing and more on the general way decisions are made. I think that any time the chairs make a consensus decision, they should send a clear email to the list on a new thread that says what they decided. I never got any notification about this and only found it 2 weeks later when I was trying to figure out why my PR had not been merged yet. > On Jul 30, 2015, at 3:04 AM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: > > Hi, > > in conversation with Cullen and Peter in Prague, it turns out I made a > stupid mistake when picking PRs to merge over the priority API. > > The criterion I used to pick was the list consensus that people wanted a > "modify all settings" API, not a "change this attribute" API to the > RTPsender. This part was OK. > > But I completely missed the fact that Cullen's PR contained all the > text that defined our four levels of priority and what they should mean > (including an enum for them), and that Peter's PR contained a simple > integer - which is *not* consistent with previous discussions. > > Peter promised at the Friday get-together Dan and I had with him to put > togheter a PR that would make the Right THing happen. > > Mea culpa. > > Harald > > -- > Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark. >
Received on Friday, 31 July 2015 00:54:59 UTC