W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > June 2014

Re: Last call for Volunteers! Re: The June 2014 WebPlatform Quality Assurance Sprint

From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 19:35:23 -0600
Message-ID: <CAFDDJ7wm_SFpu-KpZXkiLiMOv3hhhsdY=PA5TVuDg5DU=-5wDg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Hiroki Yamada <hiroki@w3.org>
Cc: List WebPlatform public <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Thanks Hiroki,

For this stage, we were only focused on the English pages.  Reviewing the
translations will have to be another project.

Hopefully, having the readiness tags on the English pages will help the
teams working on translations figure out where they can best devote their
time and effort.  It's not much use translating a half-finished page!

Some time in the next year, I would like to focus on coordinating between
the people working on translations and people working on the templates and
Semantic MediaWiki properties in the English language docs.  As part of
that, we'll have to make sure that there is a way to have different
readiness markers on the different translations, and maybe even have a way
for the readiness state to show up next to the language name in the box at
the top of the page that lists translation options.


On 11 June 2014 15:29, Hiroki Yamada <hiroki@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi Amelia,
> I signed up for the QA Sprint. Do you plan to assign the articles which is
> in other than English? If so, I can take Japanese articles. Thanks for the
> arrangement!
> Best regards,
> - Hiroki
> On Jun 11, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Amelia Bellamy-Royds <
> amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Paul and Emerson!
> That's 73 fewer articles/person.  Doesn't the job seem easier already?
> And just to emphasize for anyone not sure if they'll have time to help:
> there's a two-week+ timeline for getting these done, so long as things are
> done by June 30 it should be okay.  I myself will be disappearing for two
> weeks, and probably won't get my shift done until the 29th and 30th.
> I'll leave the call open until tomorrow morning, North America time in
> hopes a few more people might volunteer, then I'll start dividing up the
> database.
> Amelia
> On 11 June 2014 06:25, Emerson Veenstra <emerson@emersonveenstra.net>
> wrote:
>> I just signed up as well. I'll be on vacation the rest of this week, but
>> I'll be back Monday and can spend a few hours each week doing the QA sprint.
>> Cheers,
>> --Emerson
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Amelia Bellamy-Royds <
>> amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> We're almost ready to get rolling on the massive blitz to assign
>>> readiness states to every article in the wiki.
>>> I've updated the project page (
>>> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Projects/June2014_QA_Sprint ), and
>>> will be sending all the volunteers a link to a search page with their
>>> assigned articles on Thursday.  We'll be trying to get everything done by
>>> the end of June.
>>> But we've got 4400+ articles and only 10 volunteers so far, so if you
>>> think you can spend a few hours this month madly skimming through web
>>> platform articles, PLEASE SIGN UP on the project page.  The more people we
>>> have, the fewer articles we have to do each.
>>> These are the names I've currently got on the list:
>>>    1. shepazu
>>>    2. renoirb
>>>    3. jensimmons
>>>    4. julee
>>>    5. eliot
>>>    6. AmeliaBR
>>>    7. eliezerb
>>>    8. garbee
>>>    9. frozenice
>>>    10. Michaela
>>> To everyone who has volunteered, please
>>>    - Review the Decision Tree and To-Do lists I posted on the project
>>>    page and reply if anything is unclear.
>>>    - Indicate next to your name which subject areas
>>>    (HTML/DOM/CSS/Javascript/SVG) you're most comfortable with; I'll try to
>>>    make most of your articles in those sections
>>> P.S.  If anyone wants to turn the decision tree into a proper flow
>>> chart, that would be great.  The list format isn't very easy to read at a
>>> glance.
>>> Best,
>>> Amelia
>>> On 27 May 2014 14:25, Amelia Bellamy-Royds <
>>> amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>> If you read these emails regularly, you know that there have been a
>>>> number of infrastructure activities going on in order to get
>>>> webplatform.org looking professional and ready for public consumption,
>>>> so that we can remove the big purple "*Web Platform Docs is in alpha
>>>> <http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:FAQ>*" warning that is currently
>>>> on the top of every page.
>>>> A key part of this is the new article-by-article readiness marker
>>>> system, so that we can clearly indicate to readers which individual pages
>>>> still need work and which are ready to use.  We currently have the
>>>> templates in place [1], and Jen Simmons is working on adding some style to
>>>> make the information part of the layout instead of a warning box [2].
>>>> However, for all that to mean anything we need to assign a readiness
>>>> state to each an every article.  Currently there are 4408 articles showing
>>>> up in my search of pages that use the readiness template [3], of which 4405
>>>> are "Unreviewed".
>>>> In the weekly teleconferences, it was agreed that the best approach was
>>>> to do this was to divide the articles up among regular contributors (people
>>>> who are familiar with the content expectations and the structure of the
>>>> site), and assign readiness states manually.
>>>> *If you can participate, please add your name to the list on the QA
>>>> Sprint project page:*
>>>> *http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Projects/June2014_QA_Sprint
>>>> <http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Projects/June2014_QA_Sprint>*
>>>> (Note that I've already signed up the "usual suspects", so you might
>>>> want to check and remove your name if you're busy all June!)
>>>> At the same time as the readiness review, since we don't want to do
>>>> this again any time soon, we would also want to take care of any other
>>>> clean-up tasks that need to be done manually by someone familiar with the
>>>> site.
>>>> We therefore need to decide on a checklist of Quality Assurance tasks.
>>>>  These have to be simple, quick assignments that someone can do without any
>>>> additional research, and which will make a meaningful improvement to the
>>>> consistency and reliability of the site content.  So far we have:
>>>> *The QA Checklist for June 2014 QA Sprint:*
>>>> 1. Assign a readiness state. More about readiness states (requires
>>>> clean-up)
>>>> 2. Add any details about readiness/what is required to the editorial
>>>> notes box.
>>>> 3. For DOM method pages, assign index values to the parameter entries
>>>> in order to get the correct syntax to display, as described in this email
>>>> post.
>>>> 4. Confirm that the new compatibility tables are pulling in the correct
>>>> data (Doug Schepers is going to give us more information about this once
>>>> the import from MDN happens later this week).
>>>> Possible additions (if we have enough volunteers that we can afford to
>>>> spend more time per page):
>>>> 1. Ensure that every page has a summary section.
>>>> I've added a couple other sections and ideas to that project page [4],
>>>> but everything else is still pretty tentative.  Ideas and initiative
>>>> welcome -- I'm not going to have time to do much extra work on this myself,
>>>> but we wanted to get the ball rolling sooner rather than later.
>>>> Best,
>>>> Amelia
>>>> [1]:
>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webplatform/2014May/0061.html
>>>> [2]:
>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webplatform/2014May/0056.html
>>>> [3]: http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/Property:State
>>>> [4]: http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Projects/June2014_QA_Sprint
Received on Thursday, 12 June 2014 01:35:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:14:06 UTC