Oh, that is a very frustrating work. I did as much as I could with /dom and it was a real pain in the ass to do when the information seems to be structured so well to be done automatically. ☆*PhistucK* On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote: > Hi, PhistucK– > > While I'm sympathetic to your reasoning, I think that's something we can > do manually after the import is done, rather than get it perfect from the > start. We need to get closure on this import. > > Regards- > -Doug > > > On 1/28/14 1:52 AM, PhistucK wrote: > >> Why are the members listed manually instead of being drawn from the >> hierarchy or from a property like in /dom? >> >> For example - >> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/dom/CharacterData >> >> >> ☆*PhistucK* >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Max Polk <maxpolk@gmail.com >> <mailto:maxpolk@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> On 1/25/2014 5:21 PM, Max Polk wrote: >> >>> I discovered a scheme to obtain all the original urls for the >>> JavaScript reference pages >>> >> >> Done. A new round of imports has completed. The pages should all >> have links back to the correct article now. Also, now using >> JS_Syntax_Format template instead of Js_Object_Format, per direction >> from Eliezer. >> >> At this point I have no outstanding issues. >> >> I noticed a small glitch, there are a few tables that seem to have >> gotten munged such as the Number page's "Properties" and "Methods" >> tables: >> >> http://docs.webplatform.org/test/javascript/Number >> >> Half of the links to subpages point to the Object subpage instead of >> the Number subpage (like Object/constructor instead of >> Number/constructor) and would need manual updates after the import. >> I'm thinking this was an artifact created during the mass page >> renaming that went through several rounds. All the right pages are >> there, just these two tables seem off in this one page. Maybe we >> need to spot check other tables to make sure it's localized and not >> widespread. I apologize, we had lots of regex replacements going on >> and it must have slipped through my fingers. >> >> >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2014 18:01:14 UTC