- From: Mike Sierra <letmespellitoutforyou@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 12:43:13 -0400
- To: Lea Verou <lea@w3.org>
- Cc: WebPlatform Community <public-webplatform@w3.org>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 24 May 2013 16:43:41 UTC
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Lea Verou <lea@w3.org> wrote: > Hi Mike, > > On May 24, 2013, at 19:20, Mike Sierra <letmespellitoutforyou@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I like it a lot better floating outside the content. The animation > seems jerky, which is odd considering it uses CSS transitions. > Which browser? Not jerky at all in Chrome OSX. I'm on Safari. Similar jerkiness in Firefox. I see it works well in Chrome. Overall I'd increase the duration & delay to make it much lazier. That code I sent you repositions the element only after scroll hasn't fired in a while. I'm not a fan of it moving around while scrolling, but not a huge deal. > Are there any cases throughout the site in which a TOC might run so long > that it might not fully display within the vertical screen area? > Yes, and we’re looking for a solution for that. > > > If so, I suggest accordion-style B-heads. > What’s that? As in jQuery, equivalent to summary/details elements. > > Also, a bug: you can keep scrolling down once you're at the bottom of > the content, with more empty space added underneath the main content as you > go. > Yes I know. I said it was rough :) > > Cheers, > Lea > Just FYI. Thanks for doing this. --Mike S
Received on Friday, 24 May 2013 16:43:41 UTC