Re: working on text-underline property finished

Only text-underline-position is a real (standards oriented) property. The
others are obsolete should not have their own pages, unless these pages
merely redirect to the shorthand property (or inform the reader that they
are obsolete and should not be used and suggest the shorthand property).


☆*PhistucK*


On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Julee <julee@adobe.com> wrote:

> PhistucK: I thought they're used as part of the text-underline property.
> They're not obsolete. Or am I missing something? J
>
>
> ----------------------------
> julee@adobe.com
> @adobejulee
>
> From: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
> Date: Friday, June 21, 2013 2:46 PM
> To: julee <jburdeki@adobe.com>
> Cc: Łukasz Żak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <
> public-webplatform@w3.org>
>
> Subject: Re: working on text-underline property finished
>
> Please, mention that the properties are obsolete, not supported and should
> not be used, where you suggest the correct property.
>
> Thank you!
>
>
> ☆*PhistucK*
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:42 AM, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi, WooCaSh:
>>
>> Please go ahead and fill out the summary table info, and related specs
>> section, and then in the summary point to the shorthand version. Don't
>> bother with things like the examples section.
>>
>> Also, you've probably made 10 edits by now, so you should be able to
>> create pages now. Do you want to try and create a new page for those
>> property pages that don't yet exist? We do so using the New Page
>> page.[1] If you run into any problems whatsoever, let me know and I'll do
>> it.
>>
>> Regards!
>>
>> J
>>
>> [1] http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:New_Page#CSS_Property
>> ----------------------------
>> julee@adobe.com
>> @adobejulee
>>
>> From: Łukasz Żak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com>
>> Date: Friday, June 21, 2013 4:45 AM
>> To: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
>> Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>, julee <
>> jburdeki@adobe.com>
>>
>> Subject: Re: working on text-underline property finished
>>
>> So guys,
>> Should I continue working on these properties? Or just correct shorthand
>> version?
>> 21 cze 2013 09:13, "PhistucK" <phistuck@gmail.com> napisał(a):
>>
>>> Sorry for the really late response, but I believe there is no reason to
>>> add these properties (other than to redirect to the standards oriented
>>> version of them) - they do not seem to be supported anywhere and are not
>>> part of any current or emerging standards.
>>>
>>> Like you wrote, only text-underline-position is relevant, but not the
>>> rest.
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/css-text-decor-3/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ☆*PhistucK*
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi, PhistucK & WooCaSh & all!
>>>>
>>>> I'm trying to assign WooCaSh the longhand properties for text-underline
>>>> on the WPW page.[1]
>>>>
>>>> The most recent spec I see that defines the longhand properties is the
>>>> 2003 W3C CR spec.[2]
>>>>
>>>> "The 'text-underline' property is the shorthand for
>>>> 'text-underline-style'<http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-style>
>>>> , 'text-underline-width'<http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-width>
>>>> , 'text-underline-color'<http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-color>
>>>> , 'text-underline-mode'<http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-mode>
>>>>  and 'text-underline-position'<http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-position>."
>>>> Interestingly, text-underline-width is listed as one of the longhand
>>>> values, but not listed in the value field of the following table. (After
>>>> that, only text-underline-position is further spec'd,[3] although it's not
>>>> in the latest working draft.[4])
>>>>
>>>> So, unless someone says otherwise, I've assign WooCaSh to:
>>>>
>>>> 'text-underline-style', 'text-underline-width', 'text-underline-color',
>>>> and 'text-underline-mode'. ('text-underline-position' was already done.)
>>>>
>>>> Regards.
>>>>
>>>> Julee
>>>> [1] http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/Meta:web_platform_wednesday
>>>> [2]
>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-decoration-shorthand
>>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-text/
>>>> [4] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text/
>>>> ----------------------------
>>>> julee@adobe.com
>>>> @adobejulee
>>>>
>>>> From: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Friday, June 14, 2013 12:30 AM
>>>> To: Łukasz Żak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com>
>>>> Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: working on text-underline property finished
>>>> Resent-From: <public-webplatform@w3.org>
>>>> Resent-Date: Friday, June 14, 2013 12:31 AM
>>>>
>>>> I have some more elaborated feedback. Again, thank you for working on
>>>> this!
>>>>
>>>> Are you sure about the syntax section?
>>>> *Syntax *
>>>> text-underline: text-underline-mode
>>>> text-underline: text-underline-position
>>>> text-underline: text-underline-style
>>>> text-underline: text-underline-color
>>>>
>>>> Is it enough to just write text-underline: before-edge?
>>>> (I am not familiar with this module)
>>>>
>>>> Actually, what specification document specifies the text-underlineproperty? I only find the
>>>> text-underline-position<http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text-decor-3/#text-underline-position-property> property
>>>> within the Text Decoration module. And it specifies completely different
>>>> values (the working draft version specifies them, too)...
>>>>
>>>> "Unicode Standard [UNICODE] as category 'Zs'" should cite its
>>>> reference, link to the standard and to the category, help the reader get
>>>> all of the information they need or could use.
>>>>
>>>> The wiki page says "W3C Candidate Recommendation" - you should also
>>>> link to the said candidate recommendation specification (within the
>>>> "Related Specifications" section).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ☆*PhistucK*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Łukasz Żak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You can assign me to this longhand properties. Like on shorthand
>>>>> version there are almost not implemented but I can fill what I already
>>>>> found.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2013/6/14 PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for working on this!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe the longhand properties should have their own pages?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ☆*PhistucK*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Łukasz Żak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> already I finished working on this property. Because there is not
>>>>>>> too much information about this property I write what I can. Please check
>>>>>>> me and give advise if I do something wrong.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Be nice, it's my first doc.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Link: http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/text-underline
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Łukasz Żak / WooCaSh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Pozdrawiam
>>>>> Łukasz Żak
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>