Re: working on text-underline property finished

PhistucK: I thought they're used as part of the text-underline property.
They're not obsolete. Or am I missing something? J


----------------------------
julee@adobe.com
@adobejulee

From:  PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
Date:  Friday, June 21, 2013 2:46 PM
To:  julee <jburdeki@adobe.com>
Cc:  Łukasz ŝak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org"
<public-webplatform@w3.org>
Subject:  Re: working on text-underline property finished

Please, mention that the properties are obsolete, not supported and should
not be used, where you suggest the correct property.

Thank you!


☆PhistucK


On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 <tel:2013>  at 12:42 AM, Julee Burdekin
<jburdeki@adobe.com> wrote:
> Hi, WooCaSh:
> 
> Please go ahead and fill out the summary table info, and related specs
> section, and then in the summary point to the shorthand version. Don't bother
> with things like the examples section.
> 
> Also, you've probably made 10 edits by now, so you should be able to create
> pages now. Do you want to try and create a new page for those property pages
> that don't yet exist? We do so using the New Page page.[1] If you run into any
> problems whatsoever, let me know and I'll do it.
> 
> Regards!
> 
> J
> 
> [1] http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:New_Page#CSS_Property
> ----------------------------
> julee@adobe.com
> @adobejulee
> 
> From:  Łukasz ŝak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com>
> Date:  Friday, June 21, 2013 <tel:2013>  4:45 AM
> To:  PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
> Cc:  "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>, julee
> <jburdeki@adobe.com>
> 
> Subject:  Re: working on text-underline property finished
> 
> 
> So guys, 
> Should I continue working on these properties? Or just correct shorthand
> version? 
> 
> 21 cze 2013 <tel:2013>  09:13, "PhistucK" <phistuck@gmail.com> napisał(a):
>> Sorry for the really late response, but I believe there is no reason to add
>> these properties (other than to redirect to the standards oriented version of
>> them) - they do not seem to be supported anywhere and are not part of any
>> current or emerging standards.
>> 
>> Like you wrote, only text-underline-position is relevant, but not the rest.
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/css-text-decor-3/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ☆PhistucK
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 <tel:2013>  at 11:21 PM, Julee Burdekin
>> <jburdeki@adobe.com> wrote:
>>> Hi, PhistucK & WooCaSh & all!
>>> 
>>> I'm trying to assign WooCaSh the longhand properties for text-underline on
>>> the WPW page.[1]
>>> 
>>> The most recent spec I see that defines the longhand properties is the 2003
>>> <tel:2003>  W3C CR spec.[2]
>>> 
>>> "The 'text-underline' property is the shorthand for 'text-underline-style'
>>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-style> ,
>>> 'text-underline-width'
>>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-width> ,
>>> 'text-underline-color'
>>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-color> ,
>>> 'text-underline-mode'
>>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-mode>  and
>>> 'text-underline-position'
>>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-position>
>>> ." Interestingly, text-underline-width is listed as one of the longhand
>>> values, but not listed in the value field of the following table. (After
>>> that, only text-underline-position is further spec'd,[3] although it's not
>>> in the latest working draft.[4])
>>> 
>>> So, unless someone says otherwise, I've assign WooCaSh to:
>>> 
>>> 'text-underline-style', 'text-underline-width', 'text-underline-color', and
>>> 'text-underline-mode'. ('text-underline-position' was already done.)
>>> 
>>> Regards.
>>> 
>>> Julee
>>> [1] http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/Meta:web_platform_wednesday
>>> [2] 
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-decoration-shorthand
>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-text/
>>> [4] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text/
>>> ----------------------------
>>> julee@adobe.com
>>> @adobejulee
>>> 
>>> From:  PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
>>> Date:  Friday, June 14, 2013 <tel:2013>  12:30 AM
>>> To:  Łukasz ŝak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com>
>>> Cc:  "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
>>> Subject:  Re: working on text-underline property finished
>>> Resent-From:  <public-webplatform@w3.org>
>>> Resent-Date:  Friday, June 14, 2013 <tel:2013>  12:31 AM
>>> 
>>> I have some more elaborated feedback. Again, thank you for working on this!
>>> 
>>> Are you sure about the syntax section?
>>> Syntax 
>>> text-underline: text-underline-mode
>>> text-underline: text-underline-position
>>> text-underline: text-underline-style
>>> text-underline: text-underline-color
>>> 
>>> Is it enough to just write text-underline: before-edge?
>>> (I am not familiar with this module)
>>> 
>>> Actually, what specification document specifies the text-underline property?
>>> I only find the text-underline-position
>>> <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text-decor-3/#text-underline-position-property>
>>> property within the Text Decoration module. And it specifies completely
>>> different values (the working draft version specifies them, too)...
>>> 
>>> "Unicode Standard [UNICODE] as category 'Zs'" should cite its reference,
>>> link to the standard and to the category, help the reader get all of the
>>> information they need or could use.
>>> 
>>> The wiki page says "W3C Candidate Recommendation" - you should also link to
>>> the said candidate recommendation specification (within the "Related
>>> Specifications" section).
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ☆PhistucK
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 <tel:2013>  at 9:24 AM, Łukasz ŝak
>>> <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> You can assign me to this longhand properties. Like on shorthand version
>>>> there are almost not implemented but I can fill what I already found.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 2013/6/14 PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
>>>>> Thank you for working on this!
>>>>> 
>>>>> I believe the longhand properties should have their own pages?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ☆PhistucK
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 <tel:2013>  at 6:42 AM, Łukasz ŝak
>>>>> <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> already I finished working on this property. Because there is not too
>>>>>> much information about this property I write what I can. Please check me
>>>>>> and give advise if I do something wrong.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Be nice, it's my first doc.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Link: http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/text-underline
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Łukasz ŝak / WooCaSh
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Pozdrawiam
>>>> Łukasz ŝak 
>>> 
>>