- From: Łukasz Żak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 23:58:25 +0200
- To: Julee <julee@adobe.com>
- Cc: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>, public-webplatform@w3.org, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>
- Message-ID: <CACkzdM9qju5ZmHX0kp+Z-j69g6ob9P0q5eiKzuR36ifZf=krcg@mail.gmail.com>
I checked these properties on css3test.com and also on browsers and they aren't supported yet. Only one browser support one if longhand property but I don't remember which. 21 cze 2013 23:50, "Julee" <julee@adobe.com> napisaĆ(a): > PhistucK: I thought they're used as part of the text-underline property. > They're not obsolete. Or am I missing something? J > > > ---------------------------- > julee@adobe.com > @adobejulee > > From: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> > Date: Friday, June 21, 2013 2:46 PM > To: julee <jburdeki@adobe.com> > Cc: Ćukasz Ć»ak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" < > public-webplatform@w3.org> > Subject: Re: working on text-underline property finished > > Please, mention that the properties are obsolete, not supported and should > not be used, where you suggest the correct property. > > Thank you! > > > â*PhistucK* > > > On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:42 AM, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>wrote: > >> Hi, WooCaSh: >> >> Please go ahead and fill out the summary table info, and related specs >> section, and then in the summary point to the shorthand version. Don't >> bother with things like the examples section. >> >> Also, you've probably made 10 edits by now, so you should be able to >> create pages now. Do you want to try and create a new page for those >> property pages that don't yet exist? We do so using the New Page >> page.[1] If you run into any problems whatsoever, let me know and I'll do >> it. >> >> Regards! >> >> J >> >> [1] http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:New_Page#CSS_Property >> ---------------------------- >> julee@adobe.com >> @adobejulee >> >> From: Ćukasz Ć»ak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com> >> Date: Friday, June 21, 2013 4:45 AM >> To: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> >> Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>, julee < >> jburdeki@adobe.com> >> >> Subject: Re: working on text-underline property finished >> >> So guys, >> Should I continue working on these properties? Or just correct shorthand >> version? >> 21 cze 2013 09:13, "PhistucK" <phistuck@gmail.com> napisaĆ(a): >> >>> Sorry for the really late response, but I believe there is no reason to >>> add these properties (other than to redirect to the standards oriented >>> version of them) - they do not seem to be supported anywhere and are not >>> part of any current or emerging standards. >>> >>> Like you wrote, only text-underline-position is relevant, but not the >>> rest. >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/css-text-decor-3/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> â*PhistucK* >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, PhistucK & WooCaSh & all! >>>> >>>> I'm trying to assign WooCaSh the longhand properties for text-underline >>>> on the WPW page.[1] >>>> >>>> The most recent spec I see that defines the longhand properties is the >>>> 2003 W3C CR spec.[2] >>>> >>>> "The 'text-underline' property is the shorthand for >>>> 'text-underline-style'<http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-style> >>>> , 'text-underline-width'<http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-width> >>>> , 'text-underline-color'<http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-color> >>>> , 'text-underline-mode'<http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-mode> >>>> and 'text-underline-position'<http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-position>." >>>> Interestingly, text-underline-width is listed as one of the longhand >>>> values, but not listed in the value field of the following table. (After >>>> that, only text-underline-position is further spec'd,[3] although it's not >>>> in the latest working draft.[4]) >>>> >>>> So, unless someone says otherwise, I've assign WooCaSh to: >>>> >>>> 'text-underline-style', 'text-underline-width', 'text-underline-color', >>>> and 'text-underline-mode'. ('text-underline-position' was already done.) >>>> >>>> Regards. >>>> >>>> Julee >>>> [1] http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/Meta:web_platform_wednesday >>>> [2] >>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-decoration-shorthand >>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-text/ >>>> [4] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text/ >>>> ---------------------------- >>>> julee@adobe.com >>>> @adobejulee >>>> >>>> From: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> >>>> Date: Friday, June 14, 2013 12:30 AM >>>> To: Ćukasz Ć»ak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com> >>>> Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org> >>>> Subject: Re: working on text-underline property finished >>>> Resent-From: <public-webplatform@w3.org> >>>> Resent-Date: Friday, June 14, 2013 12:31 AM >>>> >>>> I have some more elaborated feedback. Again, thank you for working on >>>> this! >>>> >>>> Are you sure about the syntax section? >>>> *Syntax * >>>> text-underline: text-underline-mode >>>> text-underline: text-underline-position >>>> text-underline: text-underline-style >>>> text-underline: text-underline-color >>>> >>>> Is it enough to just write text-underline: before-edge? >>>> (I am not familiar with this module) >>>> >>>> Actually, what specification document specifies the text-underlineproperty? I only find the >>>> text-underline-position<http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text-decor-3/#text-underline-position-property> property >>>> within the Text Decoration module. And it specifies completely different >>>> values (the working draft version specifies them, too)... >>>> >>>> "Unicode Standard [UNICODE] as category 'Zs'" should cite its >>>> reference, link to the standard and to the category, help the reader get >>>> all of the information they need or could use. >>>> >>>> The wiki page says "W3C Candidate Recommendation" - you should also >>>> link to the said candidate recommendation specification (within the >>>> "Related Specifications" section). >>>> >>>> >>>> â*PhistucK* >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Ćukasz Ć»ak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> You can assign me to this longhand properties. Like on shorthand >>>>> version there are almost not implemented but I can fill what I already >>>>> found. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2013/6/14 PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> >>>>> >>>>>> Thank you for working on this! >>>>>> >>>>>> I believe the longhand properties should have their own pages? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> â*PhistucK* >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Ćukasz Ć»ak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com >>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> already I finished working on this property. Because there is not >>>>>>> too much information about this property I write what I can. Please check >>>>>>> me and give advise if I do something wrong. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Be nice, it's my first doc. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Link: http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/text-underline >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> Ćukasz Ć»ak / WooCaSh >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Pozdrawiam >>>>> Ćukasz Ć»ak >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >
Received on Friday, 21 June 2013 21:58:54 UTC