Re: working on text-underline property finished

I checked these properties on css3test.com and also on browsers and they
aren't supported yet. Only one browser support one if longhand property but
I don't remember which.
21 cze 2013 23:50, "Julee" <julee@adobe.com> napisaƂ(a):

> PhistucK: I thought they're used as part of the text-underline property.
> They're not obsolete. Or am I missing something? J
>
>
> ----------------------------
> julee@adobe.com
> @adobejulee
>
> From: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
> Date: Friday, June 21, 2013 2:46 PM
> To: julee <jburdeki@adobe.com>
> Cc: Ɓukasz ƻak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <
> public-webplatform@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: working on text-underline property finished
>
> Please, mention that the properties are obsolete, not supported and should
> not be used, where you suggest the correct property.
>
> Thank you!
>
>
> ☆*PhistucK*
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:42 AM, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi, WooCaSh:
>>
>> Please go ahead and fill out the summary table info, and related specs
>> section, and then in the summary point to the shorthand version. Don't
>> bother with things like the examples section.
>>
>> Also, you've probably made 10 edits by now, so you should be able to
>> create pages now. Do you want to try and create a new page for those
>> property pages that don't yet exist? We do so using the New Page
>> page.[1] If you run into any problems whatsoever, let me know and I'll do
>> it.
>>
>> Regards!
>>
>> J
>>
>> [1] http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:New_Page#CSS_Property
>> ----------------------------
>> julee@adobe.com
>> @adobejulee
>>
>> From: Ɓukasz ƻak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com>
>> Date: Friday, June 21, 2013 4:45 AM
>> To: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
>> Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>, julee <
>> jburdeki@adobe.com>
>>
>> Subject: Re: working on text-underline property finished
>>
>> So guys,
>> Should I continue working on these properties? Or just correct shorthand
>> version?
>> 21 cze 2013 09:13, "PhistucK" <phistuck@gmail.com> napisaƂ(a):
>>
>>> Sorry for the really late response, but I believe there is no reason to
>>> add these properties (other than to redirect to the standards oriented
>>> version of them) - they do not seem to be supported anywhere and are not
>>> part of any current or emerging standards.
>>>
>>> Like you wrote, only text-underline-position is relevant, but not the
>>> rest.
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/css-text-decor-3/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ☆*PhistucK*
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi, PhistucK & WooCaSh & all!
>>>>
>>>> I'm trying to assign WooCaSh the longhand properties for text-underline
>>>> on the WPW page.[1]
>>>>
>>>> The most recent spec I see that defines the longhand properties is the
>>>> 2003 W3C CR spec.[2]
>>>>
>>>> "The 'text-underline' property is the shorthand for
>>>> 'text-underline-style'<http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-style>
>>>> , 'text-underline-width'<http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-width>
>>>> , 'text-underline-color'<http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-color>
>>>> , 'text-underline-mode'<http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-mode>
>>>>  and 'text-underline-position'<http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-position>."
>>>> Interestingly, text-underline-width is listed as one of the longhand
>>>> values, but not listed in the value field of the following table. (After
>>>> that, only text-underline-position is further spec'd,[3] although it's not
>>>> in the latest working draft.[4])
>>>>
>>>> So, unless someone says otherwise, I've assign WooCaSh to:
>>>>
>>>> 'text-underline-style', 'text-underline-width', 'text-underline-color',
>>>> and 'text-underline-mode'. ('text-underline-position' was already done.)
>>>>
>>>> Regards.
>>>>
>>>> Julee
>>>> [1] http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/Meta:web_platform_wednesday
>>>> [2]
>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-decoration-shorthand
>>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-text/
>>>> [4] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text/
>>>> ----------------------------
>>>> julee@adobe.com
>>>> @adobejulee
>>>>
>>>> From: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Friday, June 14, 2013 12:30 AM
>>>> To: Ɓukasz ƻak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com>
>>>> Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: working on text-underline property finished
>>>> Resent-From: <public-webplatform@w3.org>
>>>> Resent-Date: Friday, June 14, 2013 12:31 AM
>>>>
>>>> I have some more elaborated feedback. Again, thank you for working on
>>>> this!
>>>>
>>>> Are you sure about the syntax section?
>>>> *Syntax *
>>>> text-underline: text-underline-mode
>>>> text-underline: text-underline-position
>>>> text-underline: text-underline-style
>>>> text-underline: text-underline-color
>>>>
>>>> Is it enough to just write text-underline: before-edge?
>>>> (I am not familiar with this module)
>>>>
>>>> Actually, what specification document specifies the text-underlineproperty? I only find the
>>>> text-underline-position<http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text-decor-3/#text-underline-position-property> property
>>>> within the Text Decoration module. And it specifies completely different
>>>> values (the working draft version specifies them, too)...
>>>>
>>>> "Unicode Standard [UNICODE] as category 'Zs'" should cite its
>>>> reference, link to the standard and to the category, help the reader get
>>>> all of the information they need or could use.
>>>>
>>>> The wiki page says "W3C Candidate Recommendation" - you should also
>>>> link to the said candidate recommendation specification (within the
>>>> "Related Specifications" section).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ☆*PhistucK*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Ɓukasz ƻak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You can assign me to this longhand properties. Like on shorthand
>>>>> version there are almost not implemented but I can fill what I already
>>>>> found.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2013/6/14 PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for working on this!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe the longhand properties should have their own pages?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ☆*PhistucK*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Ɓukasz ƻak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> already I finished working on this property. Because there is not
>>>>>>> too much information about this property I write what I can. Please check
>>>>>>> me and give advise if I do something wrong.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Be nice, it's my first doc.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Link: http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/text-underline
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Ɓukasz ƻak / WooCaSh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Pozdrawiam
>>>>> Ɓukasz ƻak
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>

Received on Friday, 21 June 2013 21:58:54 UTC