- From: Francesco Iovine <f.iovine@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 18:04:20 +0200
- To: Lea Verou <lea@w3.org>
- Cc: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>, Clay Wells <cwells73@gmail.com>, Chris Mills <cmills@w3.org>, WebPlatform Community <public-webplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CALE=BGSCnjj6nDadRmHvBkbxA8rAxW750=_Jv2_uhvJFp+Ot=w@mail.gmail.com>
Love this version Lea :) Here are some feedbacks: 1. I don't think that the "title" attribute is necessary: it just covers the labels, in my opinion. 2. Labels are hard to read mainly 'cause of the cursor covering them when open: maybe it would be enough to delay the animation timeout on mouse out (?) 3. Does it work on touch devices by a "slide" gesture? Maybe handling a touchstart event would be enough (?) Ciao ;) Francesco <http://www.francesco.iovine.name> On 27 July 2013 12:20, Lea Verou <lea@w3.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > So I changed the colors to be more distinct and customized the icons: > http://lea.verou.me/webplatform/landing/border-radius.html > Thoughts? > > Cheers, > Lea > > Lea Verou > W3C developer relations > http://w3.org/people/all#lea ✿ http://lea.verou.me ✿ @leaverou > > > > > > > On Jul 8, 2013, at 05:46, Lea Verou <lea@w3.org> wrote: > > > Hi Doug, > > > > I used the warmer colors from our logo palette [1] to indicate that > these are issues. I could instead just use random colors (the purple, the > aqua etc) and I do see your point about the colors being distinct, in fact > I struggled with the tradeoff myself. Do you think that would be better? > Or, perhaps, you have a completely different idea? > > > > Here is a draft of it in a page [2]. It looks a bit better in Chrome as > Firefox is showing different icons. The end result will look equally good > in both, since the icons will be coming from a webfont. (Sorry for > uploading it on my website, I tried to upload it on WPD [3] but right now > it gives a 404, even after deploying) > > > > Cheers, > > Lea > > > > [1]: http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Design#Colors > > [2]: > http://lea.verou.me/webplatform/static/webplatform/border-radius.html > > [3]: http://www.webplatform.org/border-radius.html > > > > Lea Verou > > W3C developer relations > > http://w3.org/people/all#lea ✿ http://lea.verou.me ✿ @leaverou > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 8, 2013, at 03:11, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote: > > > >> Hi, Lea- > >> > >> This looks good to me, though I'd prefer to see it in context on a page. > >> > >> The colors need work, I think. Right now, 3 of them are much of a > muchness, and I think it would be better if each color were distinct, to > indicate the kind of issue; I think that would supplement the icon. > >> > >> Regards- > >> -Doug > >> > >> On 7/7/13 7:30 PM, Lea Verou wrote: > >>> Based on an idea by Doug, I worked on a prototype of how this limited > >>> set of flags could look like to make them less obtrusive: > >>> http://dabblet.com/gist/5937575 > >>> They would reside at the top of the page, hence the "ribbon" look. > >>> They will have different icons, linked through a symbol webfont. I have > >>> included the kind of icons I had in mind in the CSS comments. > >>> > >>> Thoughts? > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Lea > >>> > >>> Lea Verou > >>> W3C developer relations > >>> http://w3.org/people/all#lea ✿http://lea.verou.me ✿ @leaverou > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Jun 25, 2013, at 20:23, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com > >>> <mailto:Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I like the ideas here, and I would argue for the following set of > flags: > >>>> Unconfirmed import (Specifically for content donated but yet to be > >>>> reviewed) > >>>> Needs review (for changes/additions to be buddy-checked) > >>>> Missing Content (rather than missing examples, with notes to indicate > >>>> what content is missing) > >>>> Deletion/Move candidate (with notes to indicate details) > >>>> Contains Errors (with notes to details) > >>>> I think these cover the central concerns in a way that is abstracted > >>>> enough to contain most needs. We can use the editorial notes and > >>>> develop a syntax that is readable and intuitive: > >>>> MISSING CONTENT (3 August 2013): no description of x parameter. > >>>> Thanks. > >>>> Eliot > >>>> *From:*Clay Wells [mailto:cwells73@gmail.com <http://gmail.com>] > >>>> *Sent:*Tuesday, June 25, 2013 9:07 AM > >>>> *To:*Chris Mills > >>>> *Cc:*Doug Schepers; WebPlatform Community > >>>> *Subject:*Re: Revamping Flags > >>>> In response to both... +1 > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Clay > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Chris Mills <cmills@w3.org > >>>> <mailto:cmills@w3.org>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Yeah, couldn't agree more. > >>>> > >>>> I reckon 4 or 5 is about the most we should have, keep things > >>>> simple and unimposing. > >>>> > >>>> Maybe a 4th flag along the lines of "Needs corrections/details > >>>> adding", if inaccuracies or missing details have been found, > >>>> either during the review, or just by a casual observer. Some > >>>> details could then be left in the editorial notes block. > >>>> > >>>> Chris Mills > >>>> Opera Software,dev.opera.com <http://dev.opera.com> > >>>> W3C Fellow, web education andwebplatform.org < > http://webplatform.org> > >>>> Author of "Practical CSS3: Develop and Design" (http://goo.gl/AKf9M > ) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 25 Jun 2013, at 10:13, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org > >>>> <mailto:schepers@w3.org>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi, folks- > >>>>> > >>>>> We've had many people report that they are discouraged, > >>>> intimidated, and confused by the current set of flags. > >>>>> > >>>>> Julee and I discussed this when I was giving her the rundown of > >>>> the recent Seattle Doc Sprint, and we think perhaps we should > >>>> remove most of the flags. > >>>>> > >>>>> We propose the following 3 flags (for now): > >>>>> 1) Unconfirmed Imported Content: for MSDN or other automated content > >>>>> > >>>>> 2) Needs Review: general purpose, for people who want to review > >>>> of the content they've changed, or people who want to flag > >>>> something as odd > >>>>> > >>>>> 3) Needs Examples: For pages where the examples aren't up to > >>>> snuff, or no examples exist. (In writing this email, it occurs to > >>>> me that we could also add flags for each of the WPW tasks, but I > >>>> haven't thought deeply about it.) > >>>>> > >>>>> I propose that we discuss the flags on this thread for the next > >>>> week, then next week, we change the templates to remove most of > >>>> the flags. > >>>>> > >>>>> Changes to the visible style will be done later. > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards- > >>>>> -Doug > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >
Received on Saturday, 27 July 2013 16:04:48 UTC