- From: Mike Sierra <letmespellitoutforyou@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 16:47:58 -0400
- To: Lea Verou <lea@w3.org>
- Cc: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>, WebPlatform Community <public-webplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAECD2405qiR6vudT6vmDE2Rei0G4Ls4gC8s9W4z4toY2-DLepg@mail.gmail.com>
I prefer <length> with a link to the length page and maybe a brief note about percentages and keywords, but separate lines for 2, 4, and 1-line syntax. Perhaps "accepts multiple values" should be a flag in the overview table, with a link to discussion of comma-separated syntax? --Mike S On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Lea Verou <lea@w3.org> wrote: > Isn’t that the purpose of the examples section? > > Lea Verou > W3C developer relations > http://w3.org/people/all#lea ✿ http://lea.verou.me ✿ @leaverou > > > > > > > On Jul 25, 2013, at 23:39, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> wrote: > > While I understand what <length> means exactly, I am not sure everyone > does. In order to be correct and accurate, as well as usable for newcomers, > I think we should have <length> as well as one or two quick and short > examples to make the newcomers figure out the usage easily and quickly. > > So, say - > background-position: <length> <length>; > background-position: 20px 30px; > background-position: 15em 5%; > > Or something similar. > > > ☆*PhistucK* > > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Lea Verou <lea@w3.org> wrote: > >> Yes, that’s what I’m talking about. Glad we agree. Anyone else want to >> chime in? >> >> Lea Verou >> W3C developer relations >> http://w3.org/people/all#lea ✿ http://lea.verou.me ✿ @leaverou >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Jul 25, 2013, at 23:31, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi, Lea: Are you talking about where it lists the values: >> > >> > Values >> > >> > 20px 40px >> > Any standard CSS... >> > >> > Yes, I agree: <length> is better than some arbitrary example value. >> > >> > J >> > >> > ---------------------------- >> > julee@adobe.com >> > @adobejulee >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > From: Lea Verou <lea@w3.org> >> > Date: Thursday, July 25, 2013 1:25 PM >> > To: WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org> >> > Subject: Values of CSS properties >> > >> > >> > I see this pattern in many CSS properties. For example, >> > http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/background-positionSome >> > have generic data types as values (e.g. length), others try to use >> > specific examples. >> > What’s the correct way? >> > Personally, I think specific examples can be confusing, since the reader >> > needs to extrapolate the general rule. >> > >> > Lea Verou >> > W3C developer relations >> > http://w3.org/people/all#lea ? http://lea.verou.me ? @leaverou >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > >
Received on Thursday, 25 July 2013 20:48:26 UTC